Erick
Addicted to ArboristSite
Wait better make it at least three of each saw.... I hate to be accused of only testing one representation of each saw.... could always have a bad one ya know.
Wait better make it at least three of each saw.... I hate to be accused of only testing one representation of each saw.... could always have a bad one ya know.
Wait better make it at least three of each saw.... I hate to be accused of only testing one representation of each saw.... could always have a bad one ya know.
Folks, it appears you had a good time. Congratulations.
The results are not surprising or all that interesting. The results were also poorly documented and the tests were poorly executed. Get over it.
You had fun and did some comparison runs. Next time leave the beer alone and do some testing if you want to be respected as testers and not a bunch of guys having fun.
I would suspect that the rest of this thread will turn into a buddy match and that does not test saws any better than what you did. I hope no one gets banned for being a dumb a$$ trying defend the un defend-able from the other sides buddies. GET OVER IT.
If you cannot afford to do the testing then do not offer to do it. If you do not have the equipment to do it then do not offer to do it. Just stop calling it testing, comparing, etc..
Call it fun for day followed by drinking and food.
Sounds like a fair assesment to me. No appologies here though We had a good time!
Wait better make it at least three of each saw.... I hate to be accused of only testing one representation of each saw.... could always have a bad one ya know.
Most will never own more than one of any model. So pulling one saw that is a known good runner is good enough to me. I'm not willing to go to the trouble to test more than one of each model.
I have never seen a wood cutting professional out cutting cookies to see which saw is better. As many have put it, 0.0003 seconds difference doesn't matter in the real world. There are so many variables, wood type, humidity, air temp, filing, etc. it would be next to impossible to say with a definite answer what saw is the fastest. A GTG should be FUN and involve lots of beer and joking around with saws being secondary. We are talking about chainsaws, remember?
Beware the suburban lumberjacks!
Folks, it appears you had a good time. Congratulations.
The results are not surprising or all that interesting. The results were also poorly documented and the tests were poorly executed. Get over it.
You had fun and did some comparison runs. Next time leave the beer alone and do some testing if you want to be respected as testers and not a bunch of guys having fun.
I would suspect that the rest of this thread will turn into a buddy match and that does not test saws any better than what you did. I hope no one gets banned for being a dumb a$$ trying defend the un defend-able from the other sides buddies. GET OVER IT.
If you cannot afford to do the testing then do not offer to do it. If you do not have the equipment to do it then do not offer to do it. Just stop calling it testing, comparing, etc..
Call it fun for day followed by drinking and food.
This is true, I've read where motorcycles can vary 5-10 hp within the same model due to machining tolerances.
damn machinists
They can Give and taketh away
They can Give and taketh away
Only a welder can "give"
Only a welder can "give"
I'm glad that you guys had a good time. It may not have been a rocket science test but I'm sure that it was fun.
As far as the saws go it just depends on what you want. There isn't one size that fits all. I chose the 346XP because it was a known handler and a fast small saw. When I get to the bigger stuff I'll pull out the 372XP. Somebody else might feel more comfortable with a 5100 and a 7900 and that's great. It just depends on what the individual likes and is comfortable with. Just have fun with what ya got.
Enter your email address to join: