SawTroll
Information Collector
From reading about the few that have them, they are pleased with it's performance.....
Sure, it is just that it a bit too heavy and bulky for the power........:greenchainsaw:
From reading about the few that have them, they are pleased with it's performance.....
He can't provide proof, he's a dumb as:censored: Wanabe
Sure, it is just that it a bit too heavy and bulky for the power........:greenchainsaw:
I haven't run one but based on Stihl's specs, it's smaller, lighter and makes almost as much peak power as the MS 290. .....
I haven't run one but based on Stihl's specs, it's smaller, lighter and makes almost as much peak power as the MS 290. The fact that it's always at peak power means that it probably makes more power over it's operating range (flatter torque curve) than most saws in it's class.
actually one of the problems i had with the 270's-280's is a narrow powerband. i have never run a 290 so i cant comment but from what i read it is narrow as well.
they are light saws.
This proves you know nothing.
The 270/280 have a very broad powerband. Much more so than the 290 series saws and much more so than even a 372. They are quite a fun little saw to use because of this.
all it proves is i have never run a 290 or 372. the more you post the less i think you know about saws. the 270-280 are gutless compared to any of my saws, there i said it now.
I haven't run one but based on Stihl's specs, it's smaller, lighter and makes almost as much peak power as the MS 290. The fact that it's always at peak power means that it probably makes more power over it's operating range (flatter torque curve) than most saws in it's class.
Ha! I have ran a 455 like yours and a 290. They are VERY comparable with RSC chain.
The 270/280 may not be faster, but have a better powerband.
LoL!
you just proved my point about you. you claim the 290 has a narrow band. it is widely accepted the x-torq 455 is a wide torque band, anything but a screamer.
not comparable at all. the 270/280/290 all use .325 chain and the 455 pull's 3/8 no problem.
I just don't get it. Are you just here to cause trouble? You seem to seek out a fight every chance you get. You try to stick your nose in stuff you don't seem to have any knowledge in. You constantly bicker with established members with more knowledge than you'll ever have. You run your trap every chance you get, yet Brian claims you're a nice guy in person.
:monkey:
Guy comes on the board and asks a simple question and ya'll bicker like a bunch of little "snot nosed brats".
If you have experience with this saw then post an answer.If not your 2 cents worth isn't even worth that.
Ya' want to bicker go to the off topic section.
This crap gets real old after awhile......................
Oh yeah hey Wanab leave just mows "willie" alone
Sounds like a good idea to me. It's nice to know that your saw won't be as sluggish when it's 90 deg F with high humidity and yet not be too lean when you cut in the fall.
Lakeside, can this feature be converted to conventional setup if it becomes problematic?
Fatguy, Love your avatar!
You could change the flywheel, ignition and carb.. sure... but they've been working well for around a year in the USA and two or more in Europe... If the solenoid in the carb fails or wears, it's easily replaceable. I don't see any part that's "weak" or poorly designed. The system is really quite simple.
Enter your email address to join: