Your right to do whatever you want on your own property ends at increasing the risk of killing me.
That flat ain't so... a total misconception of "rights"... that ain't how it works at all.
"Rights" are compossible... they can not conflict.
For example you have a "right" to own property, let's say a car, and you have the "right" to operate that car... although, operating it on a public roadway is a privilege, not a right, the right to otherwise operate it still remains. When you engage in your "right" to operate that car it is "
increasing the risk of killing me" because you could
possibly lose control and run over me, or something on the car could malfunction causing the car to hit me, or any number of other things. Just because it "
increases the risk" to me does not preclude you from exercising your "right"... but, depending on several different things, you could be held liable/responsible, legally and/or civilly, if your car does run over me. You have the "right" to life, meaning if someone illegally takes your life they will be held accountable under the law... but nowhere are you guaranteed the "right" to a
risk-free life.
I in fact do have the "right" to connect my generator to my private property in any way I see fit (unless there's a local law, regulation or ordinance forbidding it). But I do not have the "right" to energize the grid lines with it by leaving the main closed (because the grid lines are not my property). Just because I could
possibly forget to open the main does not preclude me from exercising my "rights"... because, the simple fact is, unless I actually do screw-up no person's "rights" have been denied. But if I do screw-up and injure or kill you, depending on circumstances, I could be held accountable under the law... because, in that case, I have denied you the "right" to life. My "right" to connect the generator has not changed, but I don't have the "right" to use the generator to kill you (deny you of your "right" to life).