Which 60cc saw

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Doh! Well, maybe when they sell one they just go in back and get out another one?

Well DOH yer self! My post was in reference to THIS one...

They are hiding here in plain sight. Right here at the top of the ArnoristSite forum page, click on LEFT COAST SUPPLIES. They are an advertiser here. They are also now a Jred dealer. They have a full line of Jred saws, not just these two. The two sale saws are on the front of their web site. Their web site says that they have 3 left of each in stock.

SR
 
I see both the new saws have a 45 degree cylinder by the look of it. Just like the 562xp

Yes. According to the Troll, all Stihl saws are just 'stolen' Husky knock-offs. Troll would love living in China, where everything is knocked off of a genuine imitation of a replica.

In any event, I think that the 362/2 is a winning design. On paper at least. The specs are not out yet. The Redmax is a good enough saw to run, though I would have bought the rebuilt 361 with the warranty. I can never have enough genuine replica Husky knock-off crappy American built inferior MS361 saws, with vastly inferior inboard clutches that are so poorly balanced, I have to lever them with the dawgs rather than removing the dawgs and not using them at all, like the pros do in Norge. I even run my crappy Husky knock-off genuine imitation American inferior unbalanced inboard clutch OEM 361 saws with 25 inch bars which is apparently illegal east of the Rockies and a capital crime in Europe.

And before people in Norge get all riled up, its a joke...
 
Yes. According to the Troll, all Stihl saws are just 'stolen' Husky knock-offs. Troll would love living in China, where everything is knocked off of a genuine imitation of a replica.

In any event, I think that the 362/2 is a winning design. On paper at least. The specs are not out yet. The Redmax is a good enough saw to run, though I would have bought the rebuilt 361 with the warranty. I can never have enough genuine replica Husky knock-off crappy American built inferior MS361 saws, with vastly inferior inboard clutches that are so poorly balanced, I have to lever them with the dawgs rather than removing the dawgs and not using them at all, like the pros do in Norge. I even run my crappy Husky knock-off genuine imitation American inferior unbalanced inboard clutch OEM 361 saws with 25 inch bars which is apparently illegal east of the Rockies and a capital crime in Europe.

And before people in Norge get all riled up, its a joke...
That rug really tied the room together.
 
Well I'm sure glad you mentioned this! I might just grab the $200 redmax for now. Then wait on the new 362 and 261. One of my buddies said he would buy the redmax from me if I got it.
Any idea what exactly they changed on these new saws?
What is wrong with a redmax for 200$? I am a big fan of Zenoah/RedMax equipment. I have two saws from them and they run flawlessly since years! If it runs well and there are no defects you can cut down a whole forest with them without worrying.

7
 
Yes. According to the Troll, all Stihl saws are just 'stolen' Husky knock-offs. Troll would love living in China, where everything is knocked off of a genuine imitation of a replica.

In any event, I think that the 362/2 is a winning design. On paper at least. The specs are not out yet. The Redmax is a good enough saw to run, though I would have bought the rebuilt 361 with the warranty. I can never have enough genuine replica Husky knock-off crappy American built inferior MS361 saws, with vastly inferior inboard clutches that are so poorly balanced, I have to lever them with the dawgs rather than removing the dawgs and not using them at all, like the pros do in Norge. I even run my crappy Husky knock-off genuine imitation American inferior unbalanced inboard clutch OEM 361 saws with 25 inch bars which is apparently illegal east of the Rockies and a capital crime in Europe.

And before people in Norge get all riled up, its a joke...

Anyway, we will eventually see what this really is about - interesting? it surely is.....:D
 
I'm very happy with my 362 C also, but my brother did run it at part throttle and it did screw up the M-Tronic for a while (stalling & hard to start).

Mine is also ported, and it is my small saw. For softer Maples, Tulip, etc it feels like a Beast, but when you start cutting harder woods, I generally will switch to the 044 before the 20" bar is fully used.

Step down to 18" then, no reason to drag around bar inches that you don't use! :)
 
Sorry but this is not correct. The Oleo Mac 962 (which is by the way a 61.5cc saw) weighs less than the 562 but more than the 560. I know old school etc. but it is still manufactured and sold new today.

7

Hmmm - I thought the 162/962 were gone years ago - but maybe not everywhere?
 
Yes. According to the Troll, all Stihl saws are just 'stolen' Husky knock-offs. Troll would love living in China, where everything is knocked off of a genuine imitation of a replica.

In any event, I think that the 362/2 is a winning design. On paper at least. The specs are not out yet. The Redmax is a good enough saw to run, though I would have bought the rebuilt 361 with the warranty. I can never have enough genuine replica Husky knock-off crappy American built inferior MS361 saws, with vastly inferior inboard clutches that are so poorly balanced, I have to lever them with the dawgs rather than removing the dawgs and not using them at all, like the pros do in Norge. I even run my crappy Husky knock-off genuine imitation American inferior unbalanced inboard clutch OEM 361 saws with 25 inch bars which is apparently illegal east of the Rockies and a capital crime in Europe.

And before people in Norge get all riled up, its a joke...
Well that guy turned out to be a liar. So wasnt trusting him again.
 
l think all new model future Stihl saws will have the angled cylinder vs traditional vertical setup. While l don't wear a husky hat and would rather wear a stihl one, this does demonstate how the 5 series was a leader in design. It must better utilise space allowing for a smaller saw but would love to know what the engineers were thinking adopting this design. Anyone know the pro's/con's or basic reasons behind it other than size/bulk?
 
One with 16" is of course even better....:D

What? You recommend a 16" bar on a 60cc saw? :crazy2:

I read on the UK Hooskavaryna site that the 560 comes with a 13" bar option (seriously!). I think that a 13" B&C would balance way better, spin faster/pull with more torque, be easier/faster to sharpen, and be far more manageable. A Troll bar setup. :cheers:

And yes, I am joking of course... put at least a 20" bar on that 560!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top