Pam and Elliott,
I hope you get a local arborist onsite to sort this out for you. The one I sent you is good; there is also The Care of Trees and Bartlett. (Or fly Jarrah over, which would be --I could have him down for tea) If the third cable is not possible due to neighbor issues that may be a dealbreaker as treeCo points out. I do not agree with dynamic vs. static--not much reaction wood growth in an old tree like that imo. I'm no expert on this engineering task, but I see too many problems with too much movement.
Where is your original cabling arborist's stance?
Jarrah among the many points in your soapbox rant (most of which I agree with), the one about not being in awe of Shigo et al's writings is the key one for me. many times over he said "don't believe me blindly--see for yourself', and in ISA pubs there are many more "should"s than "shall"s. It's sad to see able minds latch onto this Knowledge (based on Cliff's Notes readings of the literature) so passionately they throw stones at those who take it as guidelines instead of Rules, and dare to work outside that box.
re decay detection, If there is a hole in the trunk or root collar, you can gain information about that cavity by probing with a tool such as a screwdriver or a tile probe, a long, narrow fiberglass rod with a “T” handle. A ruler or yardstick will give you some idea how extensive the cavity is. If the trunk sounds very hollow but there is no soft spot or opening to probe and measure, then more advanced equipment may be used to determine how much sound wood is in the stem. Drilling and coring can measure the sound wood in one small area, so many holes must be made to get a picture of the whole tree. Drilling and coring invade healthy tissue, potentially spreading decay and decreasing stability. Practicing on fallen trees can provide valuable experience in the use of these methods.
Devices using radar and sound waves are not as invasive, but they cost a lot more. Trunks can also be tested by pulling on the tree, using the Statics Integrated Method. All of these methods and devices require experience to interpret the results well enough to communicate the risk to the tree owner. Deciding how closely to inspect a tree is always a professional judgment, different for each assignment and each tree. Cavities over two-thirds of the diameter are sometimes considered “hazardous” and a reason for removal, but with close monitoring and care, trees with cavities over 80% of the diameter have been managed for many years. (This was NOT written about this tuliptree, but in general)
I hope you get a local arborist onsite to sort this out for you. The one I sent you is good; there is also The Care of Trees and Bartlett. (Or fly Jarrah over, which would be --I could have him down for tea) If the third cable is not possible due to neighbor issues that may be a dealbreaker as treeCo points out. I do not agree with dynamic vs. static--not much reaction wood growth in an old tree like that imo. I'm no expert on this engineering task, but I see too many problems with too much movement.
Where is your original cabling arborist's stance?
Jarrah among the many points in your soapbox rant (most of which I agree with), the one about not being in awe of Shigo et al's writings is the key one for me. many times over he said "don't believe me blindly--see for yourself', and in ISA pubs there are many more "should"s than "shall"s. It's sad to see able minds latch onto this Knowledge (based on Cliff's Notes readings of the literature) so passionately they throw stones at those who take it as guidelines instead of Rules, and dare to work outside that box.
re decay detection, If there is a hole in the trunk or root collar, you can gain information about that cavity by probing with a tool such as a screwdriver or a tile probe, a long, narrow fiberglass rod with a “T” handle. A ruler or yardstick will give you some idea how extensive the cavity is. If the trunk sounds very hollow but there is no soft spot or opening to probe and measure, then more advanced equipment may be used to determine how much sound wood is in the stem. Drilling and coring can measure the sound wood in one small area, so many holes must be made to get a picture of the whole tree. Drilling and coring invade healthy tissue, potentially spreading decay and decreasing stability. Practicing on fallen trees can provide valuable experience in the use of these methods.
Devices using radar and sound waves are not as invasive, but they cost a lot more. Trunks can also be tested by pulling on the tree, using the Statics Integrated Method. All of these methods and devices require experience to interpret the results well enough to communicate the risk to the tree owner. Deciding how closely to inspect a tree is always a professional judgment, different for each assignment and each tree. Cavities over two-thirds of the diameter are sometimes considered “hazardous” and a reason for removal, but with close monitoring and care, trees with cavities over 80% of the diameter have been managed for many years. (This was NOT written about this tuliptree, but in general)