The fact that the saw has a plastic crankcase is really meaningless. It is very unlikely that you will ever break it. More important, to me at least, is the plastic handle. I scour pawn shops and garage sales all the time. I've seen a bunch of used 350s with broken handles. I even saw a brand new one broken that way at Sears that had fallen off the shelf when someone pulled it down to look at it. I'm sure they're out there but I have yet to see a Stihl with the handle shattered. I'd at least look at a MS290. A little heavier, more powerful and one of the most reliable saws in history. Same price.shtoink said:Plastic crank case? That seems like it might be kinda scary, but I suppose if you are making a weight and cost savings for a weekend use saw it isn't the worst. I can't imagine the HVA would put thier name on a horrible product and give it a year warranty if was as inevitable dud.
The thought of a plastic crank case makes me nervous, I think I would be hard pressed to be 100% convinced that it was a "good thing", but because it does say HVA on it and others have reported good luck with it I might sit tight at about 75%. I guess you can tell by my reaction, I'm sitting on the fence with this one.
I wonder if it is a heat and impact resistant, high density material that has almost the same strength as the aluminum alloys but less weight and cost?
whatsnext said:The fact that the saw has a plastic crankcase is really meaningless. It is very unlikely that you will ever break it. More important, to me at least, is the plastic handle. I scour pawn shops and garage sales all the time. I've seen a bunch of used 350s with broken handles. I even saw a brand new one broken that way at Sears that had fallen off the shelf when someone pulled it down to look at it. I'm sure they're out there but I have yet to see a Stihl with the handle shattered. I'd at least look at a MS290. A little heavier, more powerful and one of the most reliable saws in history. Same price.
John...........
whatsnext said:I'd at least look at a MS290. A little heavier, more powerful and one of the most reliable saws in history. Same price.
John...........
Russ, Not kidding or making it up. You just havn't seen the saws I or the other poster are seeing. We have not seen the saws you've seen. Neither of our samples are very representitive but I will go out on a limb and stick with my recomendation of the 290. Ask Stihltech how many he sees every day. He should be buried in them considering how many of them Stihl has sold.jokers said:You`re kidding right? The 029 was the original saw to give the plastic crankcase a bad name.
You`ve seen lots of broken handles on the 350s also, huh, but none on a Stihl? Something tells me that you are either looking for trouble and only see broken Huskies or making that up. I`ve seen far more Stihls that needed a handle replacement from a drop than I have seen fubared Huskies and I`ve dropped quite a few Huskies myself.
Russ
whatsnext said:Ask Stihltech how many he sees every day. He should be buried in them considering how many of them Stihl has sold.
John...........l
TimberPig said:I know what you mean, all you have to do is watch eBay, they show up on there all the time, brand new 350's that have been dropped and the rear handle broken. Something must be wrong with the plastic blend used or the design of it, cause they seem to break way too easily to me, if all it takes is being dropped once.
I had a 41 with similar results - I beat the heck out of it for ten years before it gave up the ghost.asb151 said:My 51 is similar to the 350 in size and power. It may even be the older version of the 350. I am not sure. I have had it for about 10 years and have cut extensively with it. It still runs like the day I bought it. Its not overpowering but it does the job it's intended to do and does it well.
Enter your email address to join: