Husqvarna 435 or Dolmar PS420

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
dougandmel

dougandmel

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
34
Location
ohio
Hi, I'm looking at the two saws mentioned above. They're close in displacement (Husky - 40.9cc vs Dolmar - 42 cc). The Dolmar has .7 more horsepower, but is over a pound heavier (not that either will be heavy compared to my old Homelite I'm using now). I gather from some reading here that the Dolmar is a a little more heavy duty saw, Correct? I'm not going to be using it every day, and for the most part, I'll not be cutting anything over 12" diameter. Price isn't an issue, because the Dolmar dealer said he could match the Husky advertised price of $269. What do you think?
 
Woodcutteranon

Woodcutteranon

I stack wood on top of wood
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
2,850
Location
Dark Side of the Moon
I have run both and IMO the Dolmar 420 is the way better saw. Better anti-vibe, more power. The 420 might run you anywhere from $10-$25 dollars more than the Husky but you will have a great saw with the Dolmar. Keep in mind it comes with the safety chain so pick yourself up a loop of Oregon VX or VXL for a more aggressive chain.
 
CGC4200

CGC4200

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
2,174
Location
mid-south
Husqvarna 435

I have a 435, it is a light & nimble little saw, but is a clamshell design.
I think the Dolmar 420 has a split magnesium crankcase like the larger
pro saws.

If I had dealer support for Dolmar, I would probably go with it.
 
Last edited:
Eastexan

Eastexan

ArboristSite Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
99
Location
TEXAS....Podnuh
I chose the Dolmar after doing my research. Great Saw!

I don't have blind brand loyalty, so when I was looking for the best saw in that size and price range, I researched several different brands & models, including the Husky 435 & Dolmar PS420. I looked them up on the web and asked dealers about problems with certain models. I also asked questions of people who had puchased them.

I ended up buying the Dolmar PS420 simply because it was the best choice.
It's a true "PRO" saw with all the features, i.e.-vertically split magnesium crankcase, coil spring AV, auto/manual oiler, easy start feature, etc.
It was the only pro saw I considered in that price range. All the other saws were "Homeowner" types.
IMO, the next choice would have been the Echo CS370/400, as they seem to be a very good saws.

I haven't regretted my purchase. The Dolmar is a very strong cutter for its size, and feels close to my Husky 51, but is much lighter.
And it's made in Germany and not China, if that matters to you.

I paid $299 for mine, so you would be getting an excellent deal if you went for the Dolmar.
I don't care for any of the OE chains, and the dealer readily swapped it for a pro chain.

I'm not knocking the Husky 435, as it seems to be a good saw. And you said you were only going to use it occasionally, so it would probably do well for your needs.

:cheers:
 
Last edited:
dougandmel

dougandmel

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
34
Location
ohio
One other question. Is the oiler on the Husky435 clutch driven like the Dolmar is? The Husqvarna website states "fixed flow", but doesn't say if it's clutch driven or not.
 
CGC4200

CGC4200

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
2,174
Location
mid-south
435 oiler

I have looked at the IPL for the 435, it looks like a clutch drum driven
oiler. I don't know of any way to use a rim setup on the 435-440;

Correct me if I am wrong or looking at obsolete information.
 
TommySaw

TommySaw

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
794
Location
Buffalo, N.Y.
I have a 435 and it's a strong runner for such a light small saw. Sounds like maybe the Dolmar is alittle better construction though. FYI the 435 is made in Sweden not to be confused with the 235. Sounds like either is a good choice:cheers:
 
barneyrb

barneyrb

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
4,570
Location
Deep South
If these are your choices by all means get the Dolmar. It is a far better built and designed saw, sorta tried and true. In that class of saw I think the Dolmar is the class of the field, and yes, I do own a comparable saw to each one. Husky 41 and Makita DCS-430.
 
Steve NW WI

Steve NW WI

Unwanted Riff Raff.
Joined
Jan 10, 2009
Messages
7,880
Location
Wisconsin
Can't comment on the 435, never ran one. I will say the 420 is the strongest running (Edit for it's size), easiest starting saw I've ever owned.

In my opinion, it's the perfect "Homeowner" saw, although most homeowners wouldn't appreciate what they had...
 
Last edited:
CGC4200

CGC4200

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
2,174
Location
mid-south
I am not a Husqvarna basher

The 435, I have one, it runs great, but has always been a little hard to
start even after tuning. I changed out the starter assembly to an E-type to make it easier to start. I have a Husqvarna 55 & Makita/Dolmar 520 DCS,
they are both good saws about the same weight, age, and displacement;
depends a lot on maintenance & condition/type of chain.
I don't really need one, but I would like to have a Dolmar 7900.
 
rms61moparman

rms61moparman

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
8,743
Location
Franklinton, Ky.
The Husky doesn't even BEGIN to compare with the Dolmar.
It's about like asking how the 346XP compares to a Wildthing.
Given any care at all the 420 will be running strong when several 435s are resting quietly in Poulusky heaven.


Mike
 
Boskaerm

Boskaerm

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
956
Location
Ringsted, Denmark
For the most part yes.

The 436 is a small plastic homeowner saw, nothing more, but it's OK for what it is. The Dolmar 420 is a small pro saw with more power, far better construction and it's simply a nicer saw to run, and will be so for longer. I'd get the Dolmar.

Can't say good or bad about the dolmar. the 435 Is not a poulan, it's a swedish build saw. The 235 is a us, poulan build saw.
 
SawTroll

SawTroll

Information Collector
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
64,856
Location
Troms, North Norway
Hi, I'm looking at the two saws mentioned above. They're close in displacement (Husky - 40.9cc vs Dolmar - 42 cc). The Dolmar has .7 more horsepower, but is over a pound heavier (not that either will be heavy compared to my old Homelite I'm using now). I gather from some reading here that the Dolmar is a a little more heavy duty saw, Correct? I'm not going to be using it every day, and for the most part, I'll not be cutting anything over 12" diameter. Price isn't an issue, because the Dolmar dealer said he could match the Husky advertised price of $269. What do you think?

You mostly answered your own question - the saws aren't really comparable. The Dolmar is built like a pro saw, with a Magnesium case, but the weight is a bit high for the cc and power output. The Husky is a plastic cased pure "homeowner" saw, even though it is made in Sweden.

Most reports that I have seen, have been positive on both models.
 
wse8562

wse8562

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
296
Location
kentucky
Go with the 420. Dont worry so much about small weight difference. remember, metal weighs more than plastic! Also the 420 balances well, has an adjustable oiler and is built way better. You cant go wrong!
 

Latest posts

Top