I thought guns in your country would be the most dangerous tool.
Tarski
The term "dangerous" implies a likelihood of unintentional injury that presents challenges as far as prevention is concerned.
By both the nature and design of firearms, it is almost impossible to be injured by one, without having pointed it at something that can be injured. Absent the intent to cause damage or a willful choice to act "dangerously", about the most serious injury you can receive from a firearm is a pinched web between your thumb and forefinger.
Of the 33,000 people you mentioned as having been injured by firearms, well over 99.95% of them had a gun WILLFULLY pointed at them, either by themselves or someone else. A conscious choice to cause damage, or to accept the possibility of its occurrence, was made. Why that choice was made, is a conversation for somewhere else at another time. True accidents resulting from guns are, statistically, nonexistent.
Conversely, chainsaws are (relatively) highly likely to cause serious injury when the typical operator has made a good-faith effort to be safe. Most operators, myself certainly included, stand a good chance of being injured while having the intent to cut wood, and to do it safely. In contrast to a gun, pointing a chainsaw at what you want it to destroy is by far not the only factor involved in being safe. Also unlike guns, using a chainsaw may not in itself cause injury, but is also likely to cause injury by means of creating yet another dangerous situation; for example, by placing the operator beneath a now-unsupported 60,000-pound chunk of wood that will eventually fall at a time, and in a direction, that no one can know with 100% certainty.
.
.
.
