SawTroll
Information Collector
Sawtroll, I can understand that the 20NK would be better for boring cuts as it doesn't have the bumper ramps that the 95VP has, but as for being less effective than other chains I don't understand 'why'.
I can also understand that a square cutter will cut faster than a round ground cutter, but that is not an option for the wood I cut.
I've taken the 95VP out a little over 6 degrees of cutting angle and it will chew through a log. For my tastes, that's a bit too agressive for limbing, so I prefer a 5 degree angle. However, the cutters on a .325 chain are closer together than a 3/8" chain so even with an aggressive cutting angle the .325 chain should still run relatively smooth.
The old wives tale about 'chip clearance' on the NK chains also doesn't appear true. Even with a 6 degree cutting angle and the 18" bar buried in softwood there was no indication of a chip clearance problem (except for the pile around my feet).
I must be missing something, as it seems to me that if someone needs a more aggressive chain, then increasing the cutting angle on a NK chain seems the logical answer. I'd rather load the engine with a deeper cut than a wider cut.
The main "problem" with the NK chain probably is that there are no chisel chain availiable - that is what I mainly use. Also, the rakers are larger than on the LP and BP chain, so it is closer to a "safety chain" (but still not as bad as the"3" chain from Stihl and some Carlton varieties). The LP(X) chain is on the same "safety" level as the RSC and LG(X), but is is done a bit differently. Very few chain today has no level of kickback reduction, RSK is the only one that comes to mind in 3/8", none in .325.