Don't give me that BS that english is his second language. He's been on the forum long enough and has demonstrated he understands the English language to know what he's saying. The bottom line is his comment and yours is condensing and lacks the respect I think Terry deserves given this situation. To say "the saw was not a success" is not accurate IMO and is apparent the original failure was not a result of anything Terry did or didn't do.Marshy, in case you aren't aware he's from Norway and English is not his first language. I'm pretty sure we all know this particular 2260 was not a success having had to have been in to 3 times or more to get it running perfectly.
We have all agreed that Terry can build a bad mamma jamma 2260/562 but this one just didn't turn out the best. Now is it seems likely that there was another inherent issue that caused some of the problems.
Sent from my SGH-I317M using Tapatalk
One would think that after the builder got a chance to tell his side of the story people might come around to the fact that Terry offered to make it right but the buyer has chosen not to take him up on it.
The fact is the buyer takes a risk when they have a new saw modified/ported. You can't expect a non stock cylinder to be covered by a factory warantee and if he expected Terry to cover it he should of asked sobhe knew what to expect up front. Some times when you take a risk and lose you win a life lesson. The real lesson is don't assume anything.
Edit:
I'm editing this because I admitt that yesterday I read into @Tor R and @GCJenks204 posts and I made a conclusion that was over reaching. I apologized to them both in a PM as I believe I was interjecting some frustration I was having outside of the forum.