but you also live in Taxachuesetts...
Correction... That's the People Communist Republic of Taxachusettes! :biggrinbounce2:
but you also live in Taxachuesetts...
Correction... That's the People Communist Republic of Taxachusettes! :biggrinbounce2:
I do talk to folks living there and it seems that you have to get a permit for anything and everything including squatting on your own cammode...
We even had to get a special approval for the wood/gas furnaces we make....Massachusetts Gas Approval Number G3-0409-392
in no other state is this required.
I do talk to folks living there and it seems that you have to get a permit for anything and everything including squatting on your own cammode...
The permit is officially referred to as the "Title 5 Inspection"
I'm not joking.
Adam, how's the fit and finish? That's the complaint I've heard - they don't work as an airtight because they don't fit together well. I don't have any personal experience.
I've considered one of their boxwood stoves to heat my garage/shop. I mean, who expects a boxwood stove to be airtight?
Oh, I dunno. I think they look fine, myself. They sure aren't a Jotul, but then, they don't carry a Jotul price tag!
Oh, sickle, you can ignore Crappie. That sthick is his idea of selling Yukon wood furnaces. :monkey: He's a rep.
Fyrebug,
How did they get an exact copy of the Century Stove?
In my situation I am burning wood to save money. I was able to get this stove at a good price plus get a 10 % tax break . It really came down to money for me as I could afford it.
Both Century and Voglezang stoves use the same thickness steel 3/16ths.
The fire box these days in the high tech stoves are made of fire brick with a ceramic baffle plate with a ceramic blanket for insulation. So both stoves use firebricks for the exposed fire part of the stove.
I think both stoves will hold up fine.
The Century FW2700 is listed as 310lbs.
The Voglezang is listed as 356lbs.
Fyrebug,
I did some research on the 2 stoves and the Voglezang Performer gets more btu's than the Century FW2700 because the Performer has 4 secondary air tubes and the Century only has 3. With more air getting into the box that would explain the higher BTU Max Rating. As I look at my 4 air tubes the back one has the smallest holes drilled then as the other 3 tubes coming closer to the front the holes in each tubes progressively get larger with the secondary air tube closest to the front has the largest holes and they are space in all all the tubes like 1/4" apart very close and lots of them.
Looks like Century is made in canada. The Performer is made in China but designed in Michigan. I have a call into the designer if he calls me back.
Geez...With all this talk about stoves it makes me wish I had one!! I don't even have a fireplace to burn either!! Makes me so mad, cuz, I have access to lots of wood all the time!! I did have a Jotul Firelight that was given to me, but my house is so small that there was no place for me to put it....I wanted to put it in the basment, but ceiling clearances didnt allow so......
Has anyone had expirience with this stove. Menards has them on sale for 700.00 and sounds like a good deal. 2200 sq ft, epa rated, non-cat. It seems like its a nice stove for the price. There are not many reviews for the stove due to it being a newer model. thanks
Sorry to disappoint you but Keith from Yukon and the guys at Kuuma will back me up on this...
Your BTU output is a function of 2 main ingredients: The quantity and quality of your fuel. One BTU is the amount of heat energy needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree F. 1 match stick equals about 1 BTU. The humidity level in the wood will greatly affect your BTU output.
For the sake of this argument we'll say standard mixed cordwood per pound is worth about 7,200 BTU at 15% humidity level. Which means in order to attain 120,000 BTU on high fire you will need almost 17 lbs.
If you can cram 17 Lbs of standard cordwood into a 2 cu ft area my hats off to you. Keep in mind that 2 cu ft likely includes the space where the tube are, so in reality you are more at 1.7. Some MFG state their Cu ft without the bricks which would bring you down even more. If your talking to them it may be worthwhile to ask them. I'm curious as well.
Notice that oxygen plays no role in your BTU. The wood will have latent BTU value whether its burning or just sitting there in a vacuum. More Oxygen will make the wood burn faster and not very efficiently (ie it will stay on high burn for a period of time but will deplete the fuel faster).
Please keep in mind the only 'real' value that a consumer can verify is the EPA emission level. Everything else and I mean everything (BTU, Sq Ft rating, Cu ft, Efficiencies etc...) is at the mercy of the company and its interpretation of what those specs are. The better ones have third party labs verify their claims.
I have access to charts that shows all the firebox sold in North America. For a 2 cu ft firebox the median BTU claimed by most MFG is around 65,000. There are 2 companies that list incredible BTU ratings for that size. Both are made in China products.
Enter your email address to join: