What do you think Husqvarna's best saw is?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Andyshine77
Joined
Jan 25, 2004
Messages
11,305
Location
Cincinnati, OH
I'd have to say this one. Its the only Husky I own:D 385xp 30"bar

100_0381.jpg

:cheers:
Gregg,

Nice pic Gregg.
 

OPEM

ACTIVE is GO!
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
21
Location
apartment
There ain't none....:clap::cheers:

OUCH!

Husky, with a few exceptions, are perhaps the most rounded of chainsaws brands on the planet today, and that's coming from a lover of Italian engineering.

You would have to throw in its twin, Jonsered too

The brushcutters are rubbish though, the Japanese brands kill them.

I find Stihl's ancient, and nothing special, the marketing guys are genius though, the 08's was a killer of'a unit and the only one i liked, none the less they have done the hard yards and i won't **** on there product.

Each to its own i suppose....

Cheers and beers!

:)
 
parrisw

parrisw

Tree Freak
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
13,786
Location
British Columbia, Canada
What?????:jawdrop:

Ya, you know it, you even said yourself its more powerful.

To each his own I guess. I knows it's faster, but I'm ot down with the outboard or the heft of the 395. Did'nt like the way it feels in my hands.

faster, smoother, that's all I need. A bit more wieght, but when your running a 90cc+ saw, it isn't making that much of a difference. But lets not turn this into a pissing match, there is already enough going on. Start your own stihl thread if you want. This thread aint about them pos's.
 
Anthony_Va.

Anthony_Va.

XPW Fan Club
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
4,899
Location
Southwest Virginia
Ya, you know it, you even said yourself its more powerful.



faster, smoother, that's all I need. A bit more wieght, but when your running a 90cc+ saw, it isn't making that much of a difference. But lets not turn this into a pissing match, there is already enough going on. Start your own stihl thread if you want. This thread aint about them pos's.

No need for me to start my own thread. No where did I compare any saw. I named the ones I like and dislike.

SO I'll give you the last insult and say that I love the 372 and 346, once again. Is that okay with you? :cheers:
 
ropensaddle

ropensaddle

Feel Lucky
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
22,259
Location
Hot Springs Arkansas
Amen to that. Those 372s are nice but they never could replace a 044/440.:cheers:

Yup the 372 ain't no turtle thats for sure more like a mongoose!<a href="http://www.sweetim.com/s.asp?im=gen&lpver=3&ref=11" target="_blank"><img src="http://content.sweetim.com/sim/cpie/emoticons/000203FA.gif" border="0" title="Click to get more." ></a>
 
parrisw

parrisw

Tree Freak
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
13,786
Location
British Columbia, Canada
I'll take a 660 over a 390 I do believe.

No where did I compare any saw.

SO I'll give you the last insult and say that I love the 372 and 346, once again. Is that okay with you? :cheers:

I'm not telling you what to do. You did compare the two above, but I guess it doesn't really matter. Somehow the same lame argument shows up.
 
2000ssm6

2000ssm6

Stihl User
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
12,087
Location
western/eastern NC
Ya, you know it, you even said yourself its more powerful.

A wee bit more power but alot of felt weight, don't forget that sucky clutch.:D The 660 is a better falling saw while the 395 could serve as a better landing/bucking saw. The 660 has not been equalled yet for power/weight. They tried with the 390.

Not going to start a pizzin match, will leave that to the 261 vs. 346 threads.:chainsaw:
 
Anthony_Va.

Anthony_Va.

XPW Fan Club
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
4,899
Location
Southwest Virginia
I'm not telling you what to do. You did compare the two above, but I guess it doesn't really matter. Somehow the same lame argument shows up.

So choosing the saw I prefer is comparing two saws? Oookay man. And yea, it don't matter, as I said before, to each his own. I agree, it's getting lame. Especially since I never called either one a POS.:laugh:

This thread aint about them pos's

I seen no need to compare the two, only mentioned the one I liked better. You're trying to make an argument out of something that did not even happen. Why is that, when you don't want a pissing match?
 
Last edited:
parrisw

parrisw

Tree Freak
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
13,786
Location
British Columbia, Canada
A wee bit more power but alot of felt weight, don't forget that sucky clutch.:D The 660 is a better falling saw while the 395 could serve as a better landing/bucking saw. The 660 has not been equalled yet for power/weight. They tried with the 390.

Not going to start a pizzin match, will leave that to the 261 vs. 346 threads.:chainsaw:

ha ha. now your the expert on falling saws? Your just as bad as Sawtroll, commenting on **** you know nothing about. When did you become a logging expert?
 

Latest posts

Top