Why do bike motors make so much more power?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Mike-M

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
234
Reaction score
250
Location
suburbs
My sons KX60 (little 2 stroke dirt bike) makes 15 hp, stock. My 60 cc saws make about 1/3 of that. Ive taken both apart, the major differences I see are reed valve on the intake and a tuned expansion pipe on the exhaust.
 
Case reeds and with the much larger carb that is your answer. Wwwaaaaayyyyy bigger than on a saw. My ancient CR125 had a 36mm Mukuni on it. My 120cc 3120 has an 18mm if I remember correctly. Poor motors are starving for O2 and gas.
 
Space.

Space to carry an expansion chamber.
Space to optimize bore & stroke
Space to have ports optimized... included as was mentioned before the intake arraignment.
Space to carry power valves & hardware.
Space to carry water cooling.... and cooling is a huge component of how much fuel a motor can burn....as a percentage ends up in heat.

And weight constraints....

Simply a different set of design parameters.
 
My sons KX60 (little 2 stroke dirt bike) makes 15 hp, stock. My 60 cc saws make about 1/3 of that. Ive taken both apart, the major differences I see are reed valve on the intake and a tuned expansion pipe on the exhaust.
What is the difference in stroke on these two?
 
My sons KX60 (little 2 stroke dirt bike) makes 15 hp, stock. My 60 cc saws make about 1/3 of that. Ive taken both apart, the major differences I see are reed valve on the intake and a tuned expansion pipe on the exhaust.
Why does a .357 Magnum produce so much more power than a .38spl ? They're the same size bullet ;)
Length of the case = more space for explosive stuff = bigger bang = mo powah!
 
Its the pipe mostly.

The aprilia factory engineers tested their RAS125 without the pipe and with re-optimized jetting. results 54hp with the pipe, 18 hp w/o

The short stroke and short rod also hurt power output, then the air cooling brings down the max power as well.
 
What is the difference in stroke on these two?

most 2t bikes are square to under square, typically only the large displacement (500cc) are over square.

ex
KTM 50sx 39.5mm bore x 40mm stroke,
KTM 65sx 45x40.8
KTM 85sx 47x48.95
KTM 125sx 54x54.5
KTM 250sx 66.4x72
KTM 300sx 72x72
 
Its the pipe mostly.

The aprilia factory engineers tested their RAS125 without the pipe and with re-optimized jetting. results 54hp with the pipe, 18 hp w/o

The short stroke and short rod also hurt power output, then the air cooling brings down the max power as well.

The "pipe" helps but without the port timing the gains from the pipe aren't as high as you'd like to believe. The only way that you get the port timing is having room which requires a longer stroke. Longer stroke makes faster piston speed. The speed in which this all happens makes reed valves super effective. Trapped volume allows for a more complete charge transfer. So many variables and things that I don't really care about typing as they don't really need to be on a saw forum. But this gives you an idea.
 
The "pipe" helps but without the port timing the gains from the pipe aren't as high as you'd like to believe. The only way that you get the port timing is having room which requires a longer stroke. Longer stroke makes faster piston speed. The speed in which this all happens makes reed valves super effective. Trapped volume allows for a more complete charge transfer. So many variables and things that I don't really care about typing as they don't really need to be on a saw forum. But this gives you an idea.

Of course port timing on a non piped piston port engine is vastly different than a reed valve piped engine, however the outcome remains the same. A 2t engine without a tuned pipe will never come close in power output to one with a pipe.
 
Case volume, stroke, cylinder size and the ability to 4,5,6 transfers, water cooling, weight takes a on a relatively lesser import...
Flywheel effect
The "pipe" helps but without the port timing the gains from the pipe aren't as high as you'd like to believe. The only way that you get the port timing is having room which requires a longer stroke. Longer stroke makes faster piston speed. The speed in which this all happens makes reed valves super effective. Trapped volume allows for a more complete charge transfer. So many variables and things that I don't really care about typing as they don't really need to be on a saw forum. But this gives you an idea.
I'm confused on the" longer stroke makes faster piston speed" I thought the opposite?
 
Flywheel effect

I'm confused on the" longer stroke makes faster piston speed" I thought the opposite?

If the piston has to travel a farther distance and the crank is turning the same speed the piston will be moving fast as it has a longer distance to travel.
 
Of course port timing on a non piped piston port engine is vastly different than a reed valve piped engine, however the outcome remains the same. A 2t engine without a tuned pipe will never come close in power output to one with a pipe.

You can pipe a saw as well as a bike. Tuned pipes won't gain you all of this mythical power. 15-20% gains is being pretty generous. Piston ported or not pipes aren't the deciding factor of power difference between short stroke and long stroke.
 
Back
Top