xhibit4
New Member
I have been very disappointed with how quickly RSC3 chain becomes dull. Have cut down & bucked 8 80'-100' red oak and ash with the same results. the chains do not last long. The chains are sharpened on a Stihl grinder at the dealer.
Today I inadvertently did an odd comparision. 20" dia. red oak felled on Sunday, 018 16" bar with PMN thin kerf made 15 cuts which actually was more because I had to cut from the other side to get through the whole log, so 15 full and 15 small, with a couple that were 30" because of transition to triple main branches. The chain surprisingly still had some life left to it and gradually started to dull.
Next up was my MS361 25" ES bar with the RSC3, the first 3 cuts were fine, saw did the work, the rest were me digging the bumber spikes into the bark and arcing the bar down to cut and then moving the bumber spikes down to do it again. Really it was obvious the chain was considerably duller after the 3rd cut.
Both chains end up contacting the ground although I go slow at the end of each cut to avoid this as much as possible, and both chains are anti kickback and anti-vibration (green label).
I can't imagine the kerf .043" PMN/.050" RSC3 could make up for the difference.
Also, "micro" (PMN/RMC) is better for dirty wood but have seen many posts about "Square ground chisel" (RS) being only for clean wood and rounded ground chisel (RSC3) is for dirty, so some ground contact is expected.
I've spoken to the dealer on more than one occasion and they have no explanation. I am switching to RSC but can't imagine it will make that much of a difference over RSC3.
Opinions are appreciated, I have a 120' 30" red oak to cut up in the next weekand would like to spend more time cutting and less time changing/sharpening blades.
Today I inadvertently did an odd comparision. 20" dia. red oak felled on Sunday, 018 16" bar with PMN thin kerf made 15 cuts which actually was more because I had to cut from the other side to get through the whole log, so 15 full and 15 small, with a couple that were 30" because of transition to triple main branches. The chain surprisingly still had some life left to it and gradually started to dull.
Next up was my MS361 25" ES bar with the RSC3, the first 3 cuts were fine, saw did the work, the rest were me digging the bumber spikes into the bark and arcing the bar down to cut and then moving the bumber spikes down to do it again. Really it was obvious the chain was considerably duller after the 3rd cut.
Both chains end up contacting the ground although I go slow at the end of each cut to avoid this as much as possible, and both chains are anti kickback and anti-vibration (green label).
I can't imagine the kerf .043" PMN/.050" RSC3 could make up for the difference.
Also, "micro" (PMN/RMC) is better for dirty wood but have seen many posts about "Square ground chisel" (RS) being only for clean wood and rounded ground chisel (RSC3) is for dirty, so some ground contact is expected.
I've spoken to the dealer on more than one occasion and they have no explanation. I am switching to RSC but can't imagine it will make that much of a difference over RSC3.
Opinions are appreciated, I have a 120' 30" red oak to cut up in the next weekand would like to spend more time cutting and less time changing/sharpening blades.