Anyone Use the Good Ole Splitting Maul anymore

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

sdhershey

ArboristSite Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2011
Messages
57
Reaction score
2
Location
Vermont
Just wondered if anyone else on this forum uses a manual splitting maul anymore. I could see that it would be impractical for someone who sells firewood for a business, but for the homeowner who gets his own firewood for the winter it is a real good stress reliever. I myself split all my wood by hand (when theres a real tough, knotty piece I cheat and use my chainsaw).
 
me and my wife only use splitting axes but i do have one monster maul for the hard stuff... if i run into a piece that wont split o chunk it up with the saw... yes we sell a little wood in winter.....just cant justify the cost of a splitter yet... my wife is unemployed (i.e) has time to split it by hand and gives her exercise.:hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange::hmm3grin2orange:
less bon bons...and more splitting...:laugh::laugh:
 
I split by hand for the time being, but anything over 18" gets quartered with the chainsaw first. I will be building a splitter for next year.
 
Last edited:
Been using this for the past 30 years. Quicker than a splitter and better exercise too.

Mauls004.jpg
 
I use a 6 pound maul or for the real knotty pieces I use the 2100 "splitter":hmm3grin2orange:

I might give the fiskers a try someday,but i'll wait for the longer handled one.
 
Still use one similar to the posted pic, I still use wedges and a 16 pound sledge when I get big pieces or hard to split species. Now that I have the OWB I avoid splitting if I can. But, had to break out the wedges yesterday on a 30 inch diameter piece of knotty pine I keep staring at....not wanting to lift it into the boiler. Good exercise, took about 3 minutes.
 
Do you wear good gloves with that?? I can see where that hollow handle might bite back as a sort of "shock therapy".... my hands cringe just thinking about it!

I wear gloves most of the time, but there is really not all that much shock. With oak rounds in the 24" range it may take 2 or 3 swings to fully split the log in half and then usually only one swing to remove each piece (unless there is a knot). One thing about the wide head, I have never had it get stuck in a piece of wood. Try saying that about an axe, small maul or wedges.
 
An 8 or 6 lb maul is all I use for now. I'd like to get one of the fiskars when the long handle version comes out. I always wear gloves when handling wood, not for the shock but it saves me digging out splinters all night.
 
ahh i forgot to mention before two of my axes handles snapped off in this cold weather... i have looked around for a good handle for them but cant find any locally...i am picky about the grain and such when choosing handles, but i wont have to hurry now.... i have bought three fiskars axes tonight.
 
maul for now splitter soo for some of the wood I get a maul takes too long and I really don't have the time.
 
Yes i use a maul. When I get a round that looks really ugly, I let it go 'till I get a few of them and then noodle 'em up.
 
I use both. I use the maul on the straight pieces when i am not in a rush to get my wood split. Use the splitter on the elm and hickory. I enjoy bustin pieces by hand it is a lot quicker
 
Just wondered if anyone else on this forum uses a manual splitting maul anymore. I could see that it would be impractical for someone who sells firewood for a business, but for the homeowner who gets his own firewood for the winter it is a real good stress reliever. I myself split all my wood by hand (when theres a real tough, knotty piece I cheat and use my chainsaw).

Same procedure here. Makes you pay attention with a chainsaw- so cuts are square- which minimizes cutting work for saw, too.

One 6 lb. maul of mine is 35 yrs. old, just getting nicely shiny. Two others have a nice polish on their faces from playing around with rounds. Definitely, the 6 lb. mauls are better than my 8 lb. at getting it done.

I've used and sold hydraulic splitters in the past, from 8-18 "ton" rating. Many types of wood, I could split faster with a maul. Much smaller & lighter, too.
 
My Maul's Mad at Me

My maul sits sadly in it's home in the corner of the basement most of the time.
I use it if I have REALLY straight pieces and have some extra energy to release.
But with all my bodybuilding, bike riding and playing with my 100lb American Bulldog "Knuckles", I don't really need the exercise and use the electric splitter to do most of the heavy splitting.
I do use it for fun now and then and also use the two sizes of axes to do up the kindling.
I agree they are faster.
Did I mention carrying 4000lbs of pellets, two 40lb bags at a time from the storage in the basement to the pellet stove 80 feet away?...lol
~Stan
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top