the all aussie dribble thread!

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
There are a bunch of things on Amazon they simply wont sell to NZ. Apart from obvious airline safety regs, I guess much of it to be distributor rules so I'm not sure just how that will impact availability or pricing if it is ex Oz. I guess the same rules will apply and local distributors will come down hard on any local retailer selling on Amazon?
Retailers here are said to be ******** themselves at the prospect. I would imagine AusPost or whomever Amazon cooks up a deal with for freight to NZ, will be wetting themselves at the prospect. I heard a stat the other day that there are only about 7% of online sales in NZ. I find that incredibly low.
 
There are a bunch of things on Amazon they simply wont sell to NZ. Apart from obvious airline safety regs, I guess much of it to be distributor rules so I'm not sure just how that will impact availability or pricing if it is ex Oz. I guess the same rules will apply and local distributors will come down hard on any local retailer selling on Amazon?
Retailers here are said to be ******** themselves at the prospect. I would imagine AusPost or whomever Amazon cooks up a deal with for freight to NZ, will be wetting themselves at the prospect. I heard a stat the other day that there are only about 7% of online sales in NZ. I find that incredibly low.

that 7% would not be right. i my self just find it so hard to get stuff and the choice is crap.
 
It's seems a foregone conclusion to me that the majority of the population agree with marriage equality as do the pollies in Canberra, as a vote in Parliament will soon show.

I can't see any logical reason to vote against it.
 
My Logical personal reason I don't support gays in any form or fashion, I never have never will. Just Ain't no logical reason for me to vote yes to any unnatural gay acts, my vote is for Adam and eve not Adam and Steve, which is my given right to vote normality. But whatever floats your float chippy
 
My Logical personal reason I don't support gays in any form or fashion, I never have never will. Just Ain't no logical reason for me to vote yes to any unnatural gay acts, my vote is for Adam and eve not Adam and Steve, which is my given right to vote normality. But whatever floats your float chippy
Unnatural acts? I think you've been brainwashed by the bible bashers.
Either way it doesn't bother me or effect me.
 
So you call man in man a natural act?? got nothing to do with religion, pee pee goes in vagina mate not the bumhole.
 
So you call man in man a natural act?? got nothing to do with religion, pee pee goes in vagina mate not the bumhole.
Lol...that's funny. Ya NO vote from me, I kinda don't care if they want to get married but this will be start a chain reaction of consequences down the road. The **** thing is if a YES vote gets up they get what they want but if a NO vote wins we don't get what we want, Shorten says he'll introduce a palimentary vote on the issue should he win government. So fair ain't exactly fair on this postal vote. Their should be conditions attached to it.
 
There will be lots of conditions on it re religious freedoms etc...
And nothing wrong with pee pee in bumhole Kain, half the chicks I know love it!
 
Apart from the near-Orwellian discourse over 'rights', what happens if voted through? What changes? Does it confer marriage rights in law that are not otherwise available to people for being people, regardless of who they are shacked up with? I mean, what sort of difference in the real world where the rubber meets the road does it make either way?

If the screaming banshees want a symbolic piece of paper that says "we're married" why not just give it to 'em comfortable in the knowledge no amount of look-a-moi ceremonies and certificates will ever sustain anything but a truly devoted and loving union. So let the kiddies play. It'll be more work for divorce lawyers in the end, so, I guess it's creating employment.

We had a similar sort of vote here a few years ago but I didn't pay attention. Can't see it making a lick of difference either way in the end. Straighters gonna straight. Gays are gonna gay. I don't shove my straight relationship down their throats, so if they don't shove their gay one in my face, we're all good.
 
And nothing wrong with pee pee in bumhole Kain, half the chicks I know love it!
Could never bring myself to try it. Bit of a turn off. Only ever had one gf willing to try but I'll leave that for the 'more adventurous'. She was a bit too 'progressive' for me. This one time, near climax, she inserted her finger up me bum because she read it increases the pleasure. I can attest it didn't. A bit of forewarning should have been compulsory for such a deviation.
 
Back
Top