I saw the new 365 yesterday. When I said something about the new model, the dealer said the he had been selling that model for years. When I said something about it being a 70cc saw now, he didn't realize any changes had been made. I got the idea that he really didn't believe it had changed.
365 x-torq
- Thread starter rburg
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
sunfish
Fish Head
Guess he didn't notice the X-Torq on the starter cover? :msp_wink:
That should be a great saw!
That should be a great saw!
What kind of retail price did he have on it?
$629 with a 20" bar. There was a 570 right next to it for 639 with a 20.
sunfish
Fish Head
Of the two, the 365 is a better choice.
Im not douting your word But the the 365 XTORQUE is stilll unproven. I belive it will be a good saw. The 570 is underpowered but has been out for a few years. The first coulple of years of the 575 and 570 may of had crank problems. But the problem has been corrected. The 570 ssems to hold up fairly well nowadays.
sunfish
Fish Head
You are right about unproven. Reason I said that, is I believe the 365 has the same bottom end as the old one, but with the new strato top end. And not a big following for the 570?
What exactly is unproven about the 365 x-torque? The only difference between it and the non strato 365 is the top end and the intake and carb. Sorry I don't see where or how this saw could be called unproven, as the strato's saws are a proven design.
SawTroll
Information Collector
I guess he was referring to engine performance? :msp_unsure:
I agree, leave that 570 right where it is. My dealer would not sell me one, said I would tear the crank out in short order!! He must think I am hard on saws.
CJ
komatsuvarna
Arboristsite MVP
So whats the difference between the 365xtorq and a 372xtorq now?
About 3/4 of a hp. Low top filter. About $180 in price.
