The Count
Addicted to ArboristSite
Prince Vlad, you know the answer:
Get both!
yes; that is the answer always; even the saws in question are in higher number, the answer is constant: get them all.
cheers.
Prince Vlad, you know the answer:
Get both!
although I fear I will never need a such saw.
Would be great to run one with an 18-20" bar.
OP, since you seem open to the idea of a Dolmar, let me give you a little more info. the 7900 is very near the equal of the 390 (6.3 vs 6.5hp) in power. it is within about 5oz of the 372 (real weight, not factory specs). the ONLY performance shortcoming is that the oiler is a wee-bit small for bars over 32-36" (ok, if you are cutting australian dust trees, the filter---fine for most everyone else). if your cutting is with a 32" or smaller bar, you won't find a better saw (and don't worry about durability, they are every bit a tough as a stihl or husky).
As much as I agree with you on the HP ratings the one thing that isn't mentioned in the specs is torque and that is probably more important that outright HP. Although I'm a big fan of both the Dolmar 7900 and the 390XP if the Husky had a HD filter system available that was as good as the 7900 then I'd probably lean towards the Husky. I haven't found the weight difference is noticable between the 7900 and 390XP after 8-10 hours of constant use as both saws balance very well. There is still no better value for money saw on the market though than the 7900
So whats the diff. between a 390xp and a 395xp ??
some quick info off the factory site
Centrifugal air cleaning system removes larger dust and debris particles before reaching the air filter. This results in reduced air filter cleanings and improved engine life.
I guess, wouldnt you fellers say too, that if the man is gonna be in wood less than 25" 90% of the time he would be better off with a 372? IMO, the 372 cann do almost anything the 390 can with the exception of the big stuff.
Thats a good point MCW
Enter your email address to join: