Bull! Two years is not a long time.
If your a contractor, your work product is subject to liability for 7 to 8 years…
…a manufacturer, you are liable for you product errors for 10-12 years.
…an insurance claim, your policy is liable for a minimum of two years…
…car manufactures have recalls for previous model years…
…statute of limitation under the law is usually a minimum of two years…
…some of you are living by a double standard…
…the thief who robs your business of all your stock is not caught until after two years…
The man had mis labeled product. He did nothing wrong, but you want him to eat it because it happened two years ago.
Not one of your comparisons apply to this situation… not a single one, and there ain't no double-standard either, it's a simple case of responsibility. You’re talking about liabilities and law-breaking; and although I agree the manufacturer/packager has some responsibility for the packaging error… it is the purchaser (end user) who is at major fault in this instance. Certain packaged products are intended to be opened
only by the purchaser (end user). With those type products
It is the responsibility of the purchaser (end user) to insure he has received the correct product within the return policy time-frame allowed by the retailer (not the manufacturer). Not only did the OP shirk the
responsibility of checking the product within a reasonable time frame,
he further shirked his responsibility by using the product without first insuring it was correct (cut loops from the roll).
As I said, the manufacturer/packager (not the retailer) has (or had) some responsibility for the packaging error; but after two years the manufacturer/packager has no ethical, moral or legal responsibility because the purchaser (end user)
did not fulfill his… and that’s the simple facts in this situation. This is not a case of product liability or quality… and, after two years, the manufacturer/packager, wholesaler and retailer all are within reason to suspect the OP is trying to “pull-a-fast-one” (
we know he is not, but that don’t matter).
And I’ll finish with this…
Saw chain is packaged to protect it from damage and corrosion until the end user opens it.
So… if you ordered a roll of chain, and received an open box that had been relabeled by the seller, would you be satisfied?? It is not the responsibility of the retailer/seller, in this instance, to check package contents for accuracy;
it is the sole responsibility of the purchaser (end user) to do so… and to do it
within the return policy time frame (and certainly before he uses it). It-is-what-it-is, although there was an error at the packaging level, the OP is the one at fault here, he did not fulfill his responsibility and for that he pays the price… lesson learned (hopefully).