Same Length
Kevin, I won`t dispute that a grinder is better over many sharpenings than free hand would be over the same number, as far as keeping things the same length or angles, but I have found subtle and sometimes compounded differences in length with a grinder. Factors such as changing wheel diameter and off center of the wheel are probably the culprits. I think this might be more likely on a chain that is continually re-ground on the same machine. I`ll give you an example of how I do it recognizing that I may be unique, but probably not. The first time I sharpen a chain, whether by hand or machine, I`ll find the worst cutter if one stands out and sharpen it. Then I either take the raker file or grinder and nick the backside of the tooth so it is permanently marked. Now I finish up and go off fat, dumb, and happy until the next sharpening. Well unless I know that I rocked the chain, I always start at the marked tooth, just makes it simpler to keep track. Anyway, overtime I think you get alot of repeated exposure between the grinder and particular teeth and a pattern develops. Thing is, I don`t think this pattern matters at all if the rakers are set to their respective tooth, but if they are machine set or filed with a guage like the Oregon which bridges a few teeth, you get an averaged raker height, not the best per tooth height. I`ve found that I don`t need to keep the teeth nearly perfect angularly or lenthwise, sided to side in the chain, or even within all the teeth in one side. Just hit the rakers with the Ryytermall every couple of sharpenings and I`m making lots of big chips. I`m primarily making full bar cuts in hard wood using 372 Huskies and I feel like I`m cutting fresh white bread, based on my perception of the speed and effort expended. I`d be curious to know what anybody else thinks. Russ