Bigger chainsaw, chain, technique?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
snakyjake

snakyjake

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
7
Location
WA, USA
The problem: It takes forever to cut trees (20-30"). I use the saw for storm cleanup.

Not sure if having a larger chainsaw would be a benefit?
Or the chain?
Or something I'm doing wrong?

Saw = Stihl 031 (49 cm3)
Chain = 72LGX060G

What could I change to get more benefit, and not take me days to cut up a tree.

Thanks.
 
Homelitexl903

Homelitexl903

CAD...The struggle is real.
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
478
Location
Maine
Are you sharpening your chain after every few tanks of gas? I had a brand new chain on my ms390 and after less than one tank it went from cutting fast to cutting real slow because I was in dirty wood and hit a piece of barbed wire imbedded in the bark.
 
CR888

CR888

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Feb 17, 2013
Messages
3,980
Location
Australia
Nothing more frustrating than trying to cut big wood with small saw and small wood with too big of a saw. I remember first walking into a saw dealership and seeing a whole wall of saws in many sizes from the one brand and thinking why the hell are their so many different saws and how the hell would you end up with the saw that best suited your needs. Fast forward many years and now I totally get it.
 
wombler

wombler

ArboristSite Member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
75
Location
The Internet
First thing you need: a well-sharpened chain. That means sharp edges on the top and side of the cutters, as well as properly set and rounded depth gauges (the little "knobs" in front of the cutters). I was amazed at how much better my first saw cut with a properly sharpened chain on it. Buy a brand-new loop of chain to get a feel for how well your saw *can* cut, before considering a bigger saw. You'll find that a sharp chain will also bog down less often than a blunt chain, as well as cutting quicker.

But yeah, for 30" logs, a short bar is always going to take longer to make the cut, because you've got to go through twice. A bigger bar needs a bigger saw, so I'd agree with Frogfarmer that something in the 70+cc area would probably do you better, if stuff that big is most of your workload. On the other hand, a bigger saw is thirstier and more tiring (because it's heavier to move and hold), so match the saw size to what you're going to *mostly* be cutting.
 
7sleeper

7sleeper

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
5,350
Location
Austria
Sharp chain AND rakers set to the correct height has been mentioned as the primary culprit. After that I would begin thinking about something larger.

7
 
scheffa

scheffa

ArboristSite Operative
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
424
Location
melbourne aus
Bigger saws might be thirsty but comparing fuel useage to ton of wood I think a 461 or 660 would fair quite well.
With the fatigue thing I find it less tiring to cut wood with my 660 with a 30" or 42" bar than a smaller saw, less bending over and cuts quicker so less time holding the saw, just my opinion and preference
 
Khntr85

Khntr85

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
1,305
Location
Indiana
I don't know if you cut mostly hard or soft wood, but the ms362 or the ms461 would make you VERY happy.... I have both of these saws and love them both lol.... You could probably get away with the ms362, but if you will be cutting the bigger timber for years to come, the ms461 will be a good investment.....

But as the rest of these guys have said, take time to make sure your chain is sharp, saw is in good working condition, and learn how to properly sharpen a chain!!!
 
Ted Jenkins
Joined
Apr 18, 2016
Messages
3,502
Location
Twin Peaks
One saw will never do it all. A small saw for small limbs and a larger saw for larger rounds. As mentioned before a 50cc can get through a 30" log, but will make the operator tired. I do not have an opinion as to whether it is dangerous to use a small saw to cut larger wood, but it is definitely hazardous to cut small material with a large saw. I have discovered so many people paying no attention to the rakers. The depth of them is very important and will cause so many issues if they are too shallow. Thanks
 
deezlfan

deezlfan

Meadow River Lumber Co. 6
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
434
Location
Northern Appalachia
OP is also using full chisel chain. He might have better results with a semi-chisel, since they don't seem to dull as quickly.

Another factor not addressed yet is the storm damaged wood. It is often twisted by the wind or impact when it comes down. Dirt and debris can also complicate the situation. It's just going to work your saw harder.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
29,499
Location
MN
That saw is just not designed to cut 20-30" wood on an ongoing basis.

I would recommend a 70-90 CC saw.

FWIW I found a real nice used 85 cc saw for less than what most used 70 cc saws were going for. Very thankful to have it when larger trees need to be cut.
 
lone wolf
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
71,968
Location
Prowling The Pine Barrens
That saw is just not designed to cut 20-30" wood on an ongoing basis.

I would recommend a 70-90 CC saw.

FWIW I found a real nice used 85 cc saw for less than what most used 70 cc saws were going for. Very thankful to have it when larger trees need to be cut.
Sounds right to me. He just has to figure out at what weight saw will be too heavy . Dolmar 7900 aint bad with a 28 weight wise.
 
Rx7man

Rx7man

Cattle Rubbing Post
Joined
Oct 9, 2014
Messages
1,652
Location
Interior BC
I couldn't FATHOM trying to cut wood above 24" with a 50cc saw on a regular basis.. only if it were the odd tree and it didn't need to get bucked.

A porting job and/or a muffler mod would help you out a little, but you're just asking too much from that saw.

I agree with the others here.. you NEED a bigger saw in the arsenal... Perhaps an 064 would be a good saw for you.. I'm not a stihl fanboy, but I do like that saw, and it'll take a 30" bar and still be effective.. (mine is ported though and wears a 26" bar).. It's definitely an easier saw to lug around than the 394's, though it's 10cc displacement penalty does show in the really big stuff
 

Latest posts

Top