regulate34
ArboristSite Operative
I go by how it burns. any hissing of oozing its not dry enough
A license ain't required to point out the facts and sight sources that support them.No matter what Spidey says... preaching without a license again.
No... that is not correct.A MMs job is to gauge the moisture in whatever you poke it into.
It does its job. It tells what the moisture is at point of contact.
Only if the electrical conductance that particular species of wood, at the various moisture levels, is known, and could then be calibrated into the meter, or if a reference conversion chart were provided... and you'd still need to do a temperature correction calculation (unless that was built into the meter and somehow incorporated into the calibration).What if a MM could measure the MC between two points deep into the wood...like say drilled 3" into the wood then two probes inserted and measure conductivity between the probes...that might give a real MC eh ?
hear ya...but even with species there are so many mixed species if the data needed to be that specific it would need to be tree specific too. not just species...Only if the electrical conductance that particular species of wood, at the various moisture levels, is known, and could then be calibrated into the meter, or if a reference conversion chart were provided... and you'd still need to do a temperature correction calculation (unless that was built into the meter and somehow incorporated into the calibration).
*
Well... if you could calibrate (and the better, more expensive meters can be) at least you could be relatively confident that result would fall in the same ballpark 95% of the time.hear ya...but even with species there are so many mixed species if the data needed to be that specific it would need to be tree specific too. not just species...
Well then there's the challenge. Someone needs to buy one of these and test it against the cheapie MM's.Well... if you could calibrate (and the better, more expensive meters can be) at least you could be relatively confident that result would fall in the same ballpark 95% of the time.
But you are correct... the only way to be 100% positive of the moisture content is to weigh the piece, oven-dry until it stops losing weight, and compare the before/after results.
Here's is a link to a moisture meter that can be calibrated to wood species, and will also do temperature correction using the optional probe... but it ain't $30.oo...
http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/protimeter/moisture-meters/bld5604-timbermaster.htm
And here's a link to the calibration chart used with it...
https://www.emlab.com/m/store/Protimeter Calibration Tables for Wood.pdf
*
L-O-L ‼Are they all that expensive?
*The calibration data in this table are based on standard tests by oven-drying of commercial samples of the various wood species, between 7% and fibre saturation. Above fibre saturation point (25%-30%) readings are approximate only and generally apply to wood that has dried and been re-wetted.
The instrument is calibrated for wood at 20°C (68°F)
The more I read your posts it seems more energy is used to dry the wood than would be lost burning it at a higher mosture content.I bundle firewood and dry is better customers that want a pretty fire to set by. Need good dry wood to get the greene wood some clown sold them and told them it was seasoned. Last Jan / Feb I sold thousands of bundles to people to get there greene wood started. I can kiln dry greene Ash down to 14 to 15 % any thing below that is a waste of time in the kiln. I can cook out the water in a rank split stack and sticked. The reason it is no reason to dry below 15 % is they stack the bundles in cold garage or patio or out side so it stays at 15 %. I can cook the water out of 2 ranks of firewood in 24 hours. I don't dry wood I cook the water out of it like a low profile pressure cooker. I bring the temperature close to lighting just a low discharge to push out the water out. I have to keep working with my heat and discharge fan to not waste heat and the proper discharge of air to pull moister out. (remind you I only do Ash the King of Firewood my customers love that wood)
What if a MM could measure the MC between two points deep into the wood...like say drilled 3" into the wood then two probes inserted and measure conductivity between the probes...that might give a real MC eh ?
sticking two points into the surface of a piece of wood and expecting to get a MC from the center is funny.
Copy.That's why you split, the "split", and then take a reading that will now be from the center....
SR
Enter your email address to join: