Chris: 200 miles often makes a huge difference in the type of flora you encounter. Meteorology is all about numbers and measurements, and you seem to be afflicted by the notion that similar average temperature & precipitation are equal to the same botanical considerations. They aren't.
Take an area that I am more familiar with: Kansas City.
Go East 200 miles, no significant change in flora that I am aware of.
Go North 200 miles; plant varieties are similar, but the size of most trees are reduced. Much fewer oaks in native stands.
Go South 200 miles: the native forests are entirely different, with the forests consisting of almost entirely oak trees.
Go West: you might as well go 500 miles away. Hardly any trees, and the varieties present are different.
Do you see my point, or are you going to give me another seminar on meteorology?
BTW: you never answered my last question, despite your long answer.
Take an area that I am more familiar with: Kansas City.
Go East 200 miles, no significant change in flora that I am aware of.
Go North 200 miles; plant varieties are similar, but the size of most trees are reduced. Much fewer oaks in native stands.
Go South 200 miles: the native forests are entirely different, with the forests consisting of almost entirely oak trees.
Go West: you might as well go 500 miles away. Hardly any trees, and the varieties present are different.
Do you see my point, or are you going to give me another seminar on meteorology?
BTW: you never answered my last question, despite your long answer.
Last edited: