Hello to all...I found this site the other day by entering "Stihl vs. Husqvarna" in Google. I was pretty impressed by the wealth of information available here.
I'm hoping to get some input on the two saws mentioned above (Stihl 280 CQS & Stihl 260 Pro) by some of you who are more experienced than I.
First of all, here is my chainsaw experience in a nutshell: Close to 10 years ago, I bought an older 024 for about $75. Then I found an 044 at a pawn shop and traded my 024 and $100 for it. As you all know, the 044 is a screamer. At the time, I was getting logs delivered to my place and the 044 made short work of them.
Again, that was 10 years ago, and my current need is simply to fell a large Bradford Pear in my yard. I know even the above saws are more than I need, but, first of all, I'm a huge 'tool guy' and second of all, I like good, solid stuff. I don't want one of the little saws. If I'm going to buy one, I want a GOOD saw that I'll be happy with for years to come.
I've narrowed it down to the two above.
The 260 Pro is appealing because of the steel construction of the engine as opposed to the magnesium or whatever it is on the others. Per the reps I've talked to, the steel engine housing is the main thing that classifies this as a "Pro" (if anyone can confirm or expand on that, I would appreciate it). Add in the fact that the power to weight ratio is exceptional makes the Pro pretty appealing.
The 280 CQS is appealing because it has slightly more horses under the hood, is less expensive and has some nifty bells and whistles - the Elasto Start, the Quick Chain Adjust. It also has the additional QS braking system, which none of the reps seems to be able to verify as being a good feature or otherwise. I guess the saw is too new (?).
Sorry for the rambling (sometimes it helps to hear yourself talk. Or type.) Anyway, any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I'm hoping to get some input on the two saws mentioned above (Stihl 280 CQS & Stihl 260 Pro) by some of you who are more experienced than I.
First of all, here is my chainsaw experience in a nutshell: Close to 10 years ago, I bought an older 024 for about $75. Then I found an 044 at a pawn shop and traded my 024 and $100 for it. As you all know, the 044 is a screamer. At the time, I was getting logs delivered to my place and the 044 made short work of them.
Again, that was 10 years ago, and my current need is simply to fell a large Bradford Pear in my yard. I know even the above saws are more than I need, but, first of all, I'm a huge 'tool guy' and second of all, I like good, solid stuff. I don't want one of the little saws. If I'm going to buy one, I want a GOOD saw that I'll be happy with for years to come.
I've narrowed it down to the two above.
The 260 Pro is appealing because of the steel construction of the engine as opposed to the magnesium or whatever it is on the others. Per the reps I've talked to, the steel engine housing is the main thing that classifies this as a "Pro" (if anyone can confirm or expand on that, I would appreciate it). Add in the fact that the power to weight ratio is exceptional makes the Pro pretty appealing.
The 280 CQS is appealing because it has slightly more horses under the hood, is less expensive and has some nifty bells and whistles - the Elasto Start, the Quick Chain Adjust. It also has the additional QS braking system, which none of the reps seems to be able to verify as being a good feature or otherwise. I guess the saw is too new (?).
Sorry for the rambling (sometimes it helps to hear yourself talk. Or type.) Anyway, any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.