Do you think there are significantly different combustion efficiencies between a saw like a 660 and my plastic Poulans? Serious question, not being a smart ass.
Umm....what? The issue was how cleanly it burns, not how much you can do with it or whatever it is you mean by production efficiency. The statement is that a 660 wasn't producing fumes. I don't know much about a 660 other than it's larger displacement. What would make it burn more cleanly?Without weighing production efficiency against combustion efficiency between the two machines and their likely/intended production environments, the question is simply rhetorical with no logical answer based upon such an abstract pretense.
But I'm gonna go out on a limb anyway with a silly wild-assed opinion based simply on the displacement difference and say..., oh, I dunno...., uh....,"Yes"?
Poge
The statement is that a 660 wasn't producing fumes.
Well, there was the quote by Quote MacLarenNo such 'statement' was ever made.
which is not quite exactly the same thing, but then I didn't realize we were playing semantic games. That is how a 660 got into this thread to begin with."I run a modded 660, and Ive never really noticed smelling any fumes. If i did it wasnt enough to even remember. I guess it depends a lot on what type saw a man runs? BTW, i use Bel-Ray H1R"
but have not come up with any explanation. And displacement is mostly irrelevant as to whether it burns cleanly, at least in these ranges. I'll just assume you really never had any idea and were just emitting fumes."out on a limb anyway with a silly wild-assed opinion based simply on the displacement difference and say..., oh, I dunno...., uh....,"Yes"?"
What - I was asking some simple questions about combustion efficiencies! And you know you only ever posted in this thread in order to stir up crap for fun anyway, and still are, so don't be playin' the voice-of-reason now.you guys are still having a pissin match in here? Lol..wood heat warrior..you are one sensitive dude.you didnt like my sense of humor and now your pickin at people's sentences....chill out bro!
I think that the first time i used an oil based fuel i worked out that it pays to be upwind , dont know how dumb you need to be to sit in the exhaust . Most saws push the fumes one way and most times you can be either up wind or hold your breathe and turn your head to breathe not to mention being covered in wood chips . Your brain is your most effective personal safety equipment.
PS I DO HAVE THE LUXURY OF TIME TO PICK WHEN I CUT SO I MAY BE A LITTLE HARSH
I think that the first time i used an oil based fuel i worked out that it pays to be upwind , dont know how dumb you need to be to sit in the exhaust . Most saws push the fumes one way and most times you can be either up wind or hold your breathe and turn your head to breathe not to mention being covered in wood chips . Your brain is your most effective personal safety equipment.
PS I DO HAVE THE LUXURY OF TIME TO PICK WHEN I CUT SO I MAY BE A LITTLE HARSH
And this is why it's time to end this thread.I think that the first time i used an oil based fuel i worked out that it pays to be upwind , dont know how dumb you need to be to sit in the exhaust . Most saws push the fumes one way and most times you can be either up wind or hold your breathe and turn your head to breathe not to mention being covered in wood chips . Your brain is your most effective personal safety equipment.
PS I DO HAVE THE LUXURY OF TIME TO PICK WHEN I CUT SO I MAY BE A LITTLE HARSH
that's a good idea and all but you can't always conjure up wind when you want, and you don't always have the luxury of moving to the other side of the log.
Enter your email address to join: