...like a GOL course under a Greyhound...
Gary
Yup...and out of respect for TZED, who's really a pretty good guy, I'd like to say something good about GOL.
...but I can't think of anything.
...like a GOL course under a Greyhound...
Gary
Yup...and out of respect for TZED, who's really a pretty good guy, I'd like to say something good about GOL.
...but I can't think of anything.
1) There are times where maintaining directional control and descent speed reduction all the way to the ground are achievable and desirable. (That doesn't mean they always are achievable or desirable.)
2) The boring cuts can have some specific benefits on a tree by tree basis. (That doesn't mean boring is always a good idea.)
3) That virtually any stringent safety oriented program will have significant benefits, especially when viewed within the context of over 40,000 chain saw injuries in the US each year. (That doesn't mean boring while falling is always a good safe idea.)
=================
The biggest problem with any of these methodologies is the "my way or the highway" attitude.
While I will state that I believe open face to be extremely limited in the bigger / taller / steep ground / conifer / snag laden forests of the West Coast ...........
............ I would like to add that I don't believe for a moment that a Humboldt guy should go to Sweden and try and promote that technique as the only way there.
===========
You can probably learn something worthwhile from almost any faller if you have an open mind.
1) There are times where maintaining directional control and descent speed reduction all the way to the ground are achievable and desirable. (That doesn't mean they always are achievable or desirable.)
2) The boring cuts can have some specific benefits on a tree by tree basis. (That doesn't mean boring is always a good idea.)
3) That virtually any stringent safety oriented program will have significant benefits, especially when viewed within the context of over 40,000 chain saw injuries in the US each year. (That doesn't mean boring while falling is always a good safe idea.)
=================
The biggest problem with any of these methodologies is the "my way or the highway" attitude.
While I will state that I believe open face to be extremely limited in the bigger / taller / steep ground / conifer / snag laden forests of the West Coast ...........
............ I would like to add that I don't believe for a moment that a Humboldt guy should go to Sweden and try and promote that technique as the only way there.
===========
You can probably learn something worthwhile from almost any faller if you have an open mind.
:agree2:
That said, GOL is an excellent course for safety and methodical cutting techniques. If your friend is new to using chainsaws GOL is good way to start. It'll at least teach him to think about what he's doing.
School of hard knocks is always a good teacher but lets face it, with felling some of those "knocks" can be the last thing you learn.
Learning from a professional timber faller would be a good way to go too, if you get the right one. You could find an excellent faller but a poor teacher. Finding the right guy could be harder than you think.
BTW - I have take the GOL classes. My instructor was very open to criticism and questioning. His basic attitude was "show me a better way and I'll use it".
No doubt the GOL bore cut is not practical or useful in every situation or perhaps most situations. But it it's another tool in the arsenal. GOL is so much more than the "bore cut method" it makes you THINK before you cut. Something too many home owners / amateurs DO NOT do.
Enter your email address to join: