Echo 620 or Dolmar 6100?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
MS460WOODCHUCK

MS460WOODCHUCK

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
5,015
Location
Ohio
MS460WOODCHUCK

MS460WOODCHUCK

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
5,015
Location
Ohio
What is the d or dd driver to tune the 6100? Is it the same for the 7910 and such? Does anyone have a picture of what the end looks like and where would I get one if I went with the dolmar?
 
Franny K
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
4,405
Location
North eastern Ct USA
"Been looking into these two saws for a good time now. Which do you recommend and why? I like to run a 24" bar"
Echo 620 vs Dolmar 6100

For my purposes 6100. If you wanted the metal clutch cover and the ability to have something to attach another bucking spike to or properly clamp the bar that would be think Echo. Firstly it would be inboard clutch vs outboard clutch. The dolmar can run 7 and 8 tooth in 0.325 the echo 9 only. Folks (who type more anyway) here seem 3/8 only for 60cc. Is the Echo strato with a carb and a separate air only device? That could be the big one for some folks. The bar has been discussed prior. I do not think either has a filled crank, I would factor that in. I kind of like the reed valve idea that being dolmar.
Like previously stated goofy spike there is an European version in the parts sheet.
It looked like a pound and a half difference in those pictures with the scale.

Fran
 
RedneckChainsawRepair
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
9,365
Location
Ohio
I love my 60cc poulans but have 4 now and would like to have a different saw to run sometimes and the wife is offering to buy my a new saw for my bday and these two big names are out of her price range lol.

Well heck yeah, cant pass that up. :bowdown::clap::happybanana::cheers:

The other day while at a dealer buying a echo 280 power broom set up. I got to check out a 620. Looked nice. Was sold out of 6100 so no side by side comparison.
The 620 was in the 5's cant remember where.
The 562 at my local is 660 with 20". I know I can get it in the higher 5's too at a dealer ;).
Heck might look at a jonsered 2260 in small mount too. = 560xp

I been fighting the urge to get a 2188 or 390 and selling off all my big poulans and parts myself. Just sold a 83cc cylinder and crankshaft to a guy needing stuff for rebuild.

pwildthing505 016.JPG
 
jd548esco72

jd548esco72

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
873
Location
south
i suspect the 6100 would be a real barn burner ported-- i think a pretty serious carb re-work is in order for a really serious ported saw-- thats why i'm keeping my 6100 stock. im not that serious-- a muffler mod along with the basic stuff is about as far as i want to go--

and the 6100 has exceptional fuel economy and power -- i figure more power from carb mods and porting will make more power = burning more fuel.

the 620 has a standard size clutch rim and a 009 large husky bar mount -- i think the 620 can be seriously ported without re-drilling jet holes in the carb--

OEM power for the 6100 is 4.6HP and 4.5 on the 620. since i haven't run a stock 620 i can't tell ya how a stock one runs --

my 620 came with that reverse deflector in the muffler so it is rather restricted out of the box-- of course i am busy cutting up the muffler right now--

there are some threads on porting the 6100 . the 6100 is such a well tuned saw stock , i suspect it takes a bit more effort to get more out of it than the 620 , although it might make more power if their equally modded--

both are great saws-- i wasn't really looking to buy a 6100 --but such a great deal came along i couldn't pass it up--

my guess would be if you want to do your own mild tune up a 620 might be better-- but if you gonna have a 'pro" port it and set it up-- probably the 6100

but that is just me and i ain't taking the thing to the nationals-- just a little more grunt to power through those knots is all i am after.

as far as weight i can't tell much from running one of the other-- if you have run 372s or 440s much they seem light enough.

i think weight is 'overplayed" anyway --
 
Termite

Termite

Time To Launch
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
1,767
Location
milltown indiana
I don't see the plastic clutch cover as a negative. The 6100 with a gutted muffler is an excellent easy to start saw but the size and weight seemed closer to my 365xt than my 2260 Jonsered. Just my subjective opinion.
 
chipper1

chipper1

Living Life to the Full
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
45,221
Location
GR. MI.
John the lightest new saw is the Type 2 NE 362. Not the ole pig 362. ;)

It's lighter then the 562.

View attachment 562818 View attachment 562819
Hey JJ, was that the earlier 562, the newest revision is substantially heavier.
The old 362 was a turd hence the 361 becoming a legend, but the newest ones are great I've heard from buddies who own them.
OP did you make a decision yet.
I agree with @CR888 that the 555 is a fun saw, one of my favorites, I run it with a 66dl 3/8 B&C.
That being said I wouldn't run a 24 on a 60cc saw cutting hardwood unless it was ported.
I would get a lightweight(stihl is the lightest pretty sure) bar for one of the saws you have and fill the tank half full of fuel ;).
 
Top