Officer's Match
Addicted to ArboristSite
You scared the #### outta everyone. :msp_unsure:
Nahh, I don't have enough sense to be skeered.
You scared the #### outta everyone. :msp_unsure:
Nahh, I don't have enough sense to be skeered.
Can you make a pie chart or a graph to help me better understand the question. My stupid a little bit and stuff. :msp_tongue:
I just built Randy Watson a 346 using an aftermarket kit. It seemed to run well.....I din't run it side by side with an OEM one.....but it did run well enough that I was happy with it.
I figured it like this.
You charge $250 for a woods port
OEM $295+250=545/20(the hypothetical extra gains)=$29.95per %
AM 103+250=353/20=17.65per% gained
The question is it worth the money to go OEM if you still get solid gains and durability from a cheaper option?
Did someone say pie ?
I have no dog in this race but I have to ask..........can you achive the same port timing numbers with a aftermarket top end that you can with a OEM? And if so is it the transfers volume that makes the difference. Say you have a lathe/mill so you can gut what ever you want is it just not possible. And then you gotta think that maybe for a hundred less some people will just be happy with only 20% slower. I only make firewood with my saw so I really don't need super speed, just day in day out dependability............yeah Guys, I know I can't spell.
Can I set you on fire? :msp_mellow:
I've never had much money.......had to work damn hard for it too.
If the saw cuts wood and holds up......I'm going for the least expensive way to get back to work.
Now if I had plenty to spend I would pony up the extra money and get the OEM parts.
QC is better with OEM.....there's no doubt about that. The aftermarket is doing better in some cases. I've tested and checked on a bunch of kits for Randy and Henry lately. Some just won't work because the port shapes are all wrong.....or they free port......I'm even seen one that was out of round (on a kit from another supplier).
The way Randy and Henry do business is what has driven me to stand with them. They are trying to get a good kit at a fair price. If that kit fails I believe they will do all they can to make it right. I've never said AM is better.......but it can be a affordable and usable option.
Yeah, and one of the reasons those "banned folks" aren't around anymore was that they'd rather argue, posture, and defame than settle their differences.
Sound familiar?
Hi Randy.
Can I come back in outta the rain?
Please do , so when do we get to discuss cranks ? :msp_wink:
I'm still disappointed that you got rid of coveredinsap.
I'm still disappointed that you got rid of coveredinsap.
In general with the current cheaper aftermarket kits- it's a combination of poor timing, sloppy CCs, and poor fitment.
Do you see that changing any time soon? As AM users become more demanding of quality will the quality improve? Or will it always be a crap shoot?
Do you see that changing any time soon? As AM users become more demanding of quality will the quality improve? Or will it always be a crap shoot?
Do you see that changing any time soon? As AM users become more demanding of quality will the quality improve? Or will it always be a crap shoot?
Enter your email address to join: