mikefunaro
Addicted to ArboristSite
Hey all--
The more I look at a lot of threads, the more it seems that a few people have strongly advocated their own idea about a saw or series of saws, and then even though others have not used the saw, they continue to carry on the idea and insist that it is true.
I dont think it should be a requirement or anything, but I'm starting to think that we should make it more clear whether or not we have run the saw or whether we're just regurgitating the common opinion on the arboristsite.
I sometimes try to make it clear by saying "on paper" or "there are accounts that"...but really. Looking at the 441 thread and seeing all the 441 bashing. Has everyone run it? Just because someone comes and says I love my 460, if you didn't run a 441, you might want to put it out there.
I'm not accusing anyone in specific of anything but it seems like we're just having a big circlejerk a lot of the time without opinions actually developed in use.
Just a rant...but do people agree/disagree?
Mike
The more I look at a lot of threads, the more it seems that a few people have strongly advocated their own idea about a saw or series of saws, and then even though others have not used the saw, they continue to carry on the idea and insist that it is true.
I dont think it should be a requirement or anything, but I'm starting to think that we should make it more clear whether or not we have run the saw or whether we're just regurgitating the common opinion on the arboristsite.
I sometimes try to make it clear by saying "on paper" or "there are accounts that"...but really. Looking at the 441 thread and seeing all the 441 bashing. Has everyone run it? Just because someone comes and says I love my 460, if you didn't run a 441, you might want to put it out there.
I'm not accusing anyone in specific of anything but it seems like we're just having a big circlejerk a lot of the time without opinions actually developed in use.
Just a rant...but do people agree/disagree?
Mike
Last edited: