CDTS447
ArboristSite Lurker
So I've recently acquired a Virginia client who's requested a permanent solution to the neighbors bamboo growing in to her yard, a service I have done several times using a trencher, bamboo shield/barrier and either chemical treatment or excavation. This client wants the full package: dig up the entire site, (a 90'x20' area of the lawn at the back of the property to exhume all the rhizomes, trench the the entire rear fence line and install 30" bamboo shield before putting the yard back to the way it was.
There's a small problem: A 28" DBH American elm is about 4 feet on the other side of the fence at about the midpoint of the yard. It belongs to the neighbor and after doing a root zone impact survey, about 30% of the root zone will be impacted by the excavation. I've read a few different sources that point to not cutting more than about 15% of the roots but another arborist friend of mine pointed out to me that construction in housing developments have done far worse to trees that have recovered just fine.
Clients are unable to contact the neighbors (the house is unkempt but there do appear to be tenants/people living there).
2 questions:
1) Does the invasive nature of the bamboo give the client any recourse to protect their property at the cost of the neighbors tree should it be negatively impacted? (Not quite to this point but would be nice to have the answer if we exhaust other options).
2) Does 30% seem like too much of a loss for the tree to recover from even if dormant?
Either way, disclaimers abound in the contract. Would like to hear from more experienced arborists anything that I may be missing.
There's a small problem: A 28" DBH American elm is about 4 feet on the other side of the fence at about the midpoint of the yard. It belongs to the neighbor and after doing a root zone impact survey, about 30% of the root zone will be impacted by the excavation. I've read a few different sources that point to not cutting more than about 15% of the roots but another arborist friend of mine pointed out to me that construction in housing developments have done far worse to trees that have recovered just fine.
Clients are unable to contact the neighbors (the house is unkempt but there do appear to be tenants/people living there).
2 questions:
1) Does the invasive nature of the bamboo give the client any recourse to protect their property at the cost of the neighbors tree should it be negatively impacted? (Not quite to this point but would be nice to have the answer if we exhaust other options).
2) Does 30% seem like too much of a loss for the tree to recover from even if dormant?
Either way, disclaimers abound in the contract. Would like to hear from more experienced arborists anything that I may be missing.