Thats the one I also have. But like you said the solvent you put in it can cost about $10.00 a gallon.
So….do you plan on running a 359 carb on it?
Anyone know if specs are available online for the venture size of the 346 and 357/359 carbs? I can't get my calipers in there without removing the throttle plate and rod. I'm not going to do that.
If I get energetic enough, and find the time, I may make timed cuts with this 350, then swap the 357 carb from my 346 and see if it makes any real difference. I've always wanted to know.
The first thing I noticed after the mods was the throttle response.
Here's the carb info.
2150 Zama C3-EL32 15.0mm venturi
350 Zama C3-EL18 A/B 15.0mm venturi
You’ll have to use the look-up page below to verify.
http://www.zamacarb.com/prod_lookup.cfm
350 Walbro HDA-195 Carb: 15.08mm venturi
http://wem.walbro.com/walbro/product2.asp?Series=HDA&partnum=HDA%2D195%2D1
2159 Walbro HDA-175 16.66mm venturi
http://wem.walbro.com/walbro/product2.asp?Series=HDA&partnum=HDA%2D175%2D1
357 Walbro HDA-198 16.66mm venturi
http://wem.walbro.com/walbro/product2.asp?Series=HDA&partnum=HDA%2D198%2D1
Did you reseal the crankcase where the plastic and metal meet? The one I did leaked badly in that area.
Might want to check the tank vent since it probably has a much healthier appetite for mix than it did before. The vent might not be able to keep up like on the 346(?) you had. My 2150 was not venting as fast as it had to either.
A lot of people look at these threads as "how to" threads, so with that in mind, I'd like to raise a few points simply to provide an alternative viewpoint for discussion, not as a criticism of the work Brad was kind enough to share.
You'll read a lot that a rough finish does not have much of an effect on flow, which is true, but there is a big difference between a rough finish, and an uneven finish. I'm sure the camera exaggerates the effect, but if you can see the tracks of the burr, then the finish is uneven enough to produce eddies that do have a negative effect on flow. Given the overall improvement in flow from the port work itself, this might be marginal, but one side effect of the eddies is carbon buildup. You don't need a mirror finish, but the surfaces should be even for maximum flow.
You can say it doesn't matter, but the people that have flow benches seem to think it does...
Like the 440? I don't like the squareness of the port edges, because it can be hard on the rings (or catastrophic if a ring hangs). That doesn't mean it won't work out fine in most cases, but the risk is real.
Another consideration for port shape, however is symmetry. With one round profile and one square profile, the ring gets forced back into the cylinder unevenly. This can stress the ring, because it is not free to move, and can cause the ring to bear unevenly on the pin, to the point of working it loose with enough use.
Speaking of symmetry, the only real danger to working on the transfers is producing a lack of symmetry. If one flows better than another, the efficiency of scavenging drops off dramatically. The saw won't run noticeably poorly, (especially at high rpms) but it will be a ways from optimal. If you are going to work on the transfers, you should find a way to test whether they have symmetrical flow.
Easy to check the side tranfer access caps for a leak. On the first 359 I did after a couple tanks the cap started to leak and gave the same symptoms. Not sayin thats it but easy to test.
Enter your email address to join: