Husky's 346NE Crowned the new KING.

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_6KUyxCfxY0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_6KUyxCfxY0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



BD, that 346 is hot fro' sur' but i think my saw may have a bit more torque.




:cheers:

Most of the run during the consistent parts was spent between 8,100 and 8,400.
 
Most of the run during the consistent parts was spent between 8,100 and 8,400.


your theory is flawed mate, i prefer to use a tach. the saw turned more RPM in the cut stock than that.


LMAO!


:popcorn:
 
Here is video of a 346NE with 24inch bar modded by TsT.
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UdMhlj4xF5w"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UdMhlj4xF5w" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Nice saw dude!
 
Trying to be reasonable, I talked myself out of buying one a few weeks ago. You guys are brutal.
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the woods.......



Kevin
 
your theory is flawed mate, i prefer to use a tach. the saw turned more RPM in the cut stock than that.


LMAO!


:popcorn:

It isn't my theory, it's Nyquist's... If the video camera was recording at 44.1 kHz, the frequency analysis method is absolutely correct. Video tape the tach during your next tune and post the video I'll analyze the video and see if it matches.

Edit: I checked your blips before the cut and they were registering 13,500. That shows that aliasing isn't an issue. The saw is not running as fast as you think it is during this cut...
 
Last edited:
wanab... having mis-guided ideas about how well his saws perform?..... that cant be right, surely?:popcorn:

LoL!

im misguided and so is the stopwatch.

think what you want about my saws.

how does mic clipping effect yours results? i have tached the saw in the wood but no point in me posting a video, surley somebody would claim i was holding up on the saw.


:cheers:
 
no point in me posting a video, surley somebody would claim i was holding up on the saw
not if you timed it at the same time - if you reproduced that time AND tached in the cut you couldn't be holding it up...

how does mic clipping effect yours results?
I'd assume he has thought about this and found it doesn't affect the results. If you were using a half decent camera the mic preamp should adjust the gain so it won't clip
 
It isn't my theory, it's Nyquist's... If the video camera was recording at 44.1 kHz, the frequency analysis method is absolutely correct. Video tape the tach during your next tune and post the video I'll analyze the video and see if it matches.

Edit: I checked your blips before the cut and they were registering 13,500. That shows that aliasing isn't an issue. The saw is not running as fast as you think it is during this cut...

That is interesting. Way over my head. So do you have a program that gives you the rpm range?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top