GASoline71
Mr. Nice Guy
Holy cats... for $50 bucks I can get a 25" Stihl ES!
Gary
Gary
Holy cats... for $50 bucks I can get a 25" Stihl ES!
Gary
I sure hope there are .050 3/8 bars. I have one from GB that runs great on the 066. I am working on getting 8 pin rims and want to see what that might do.
Hal
I am curious to see if you actually get an .050 and not .063...
Gary
What size bar? If you saw is stock your missing out! I have the 7 and 8, definitely rip's with 20" 8 pin
50 gauge in long bars has a tendancy to throw chains more often. You'll get good at the bending the bar over your knee trick to put your chain back on. Really easy to do with a 36.
what i have read points me towards .62 gauge. Do the stihl's come in .63 as well?
3003 000 6053 11t .063
3003 000 9853 13t .063
.
Madsens sells bars over 32" in 063 thats where I got the misconception on gauges over 32" my local shop also sell bars over 32" only in 063.50 gauge in long bars has a tendancy to throw chains more often. You'll get good at the bending the bar over your knee trick to put your chain back on. Really easy to do with a 36.
Thanks, the 13tooth is better for bore cutting but has higher chance for kickback?
True, but we will assume that since you have a 660 that you are quite capable of controlling kickback and the situations that cause it.
You do keep your thumbs wrapped, right?
.
Gary,
The part numbers for the .050 bars are:
Stihl Rollomatic ES 36" .050 guage 11T nose- 3003 000 8853
Stihl Rollomatic ES 36" .050 guage 13T nose- 3003 000 9563
B&C catalog...
.
50 gauge in long bars has a tendancy to throw chains more often. You'll get good at the bending the bar over your knee trick to put your chain back on. Really easy to do with a 36.
Madsens sells bars over 32" in 063 thats where I got the misconception on gauges over 32" my local shop also sell bars over 32" only in 063.
I heard about the higher tendency for kickback with the 13 tooth vs the 11 tooth. How much more of a risk or tendency is there though? It's probably really hard to even measure but are we talking like a 76% chance vs a 79%? I know you can't compare it like that, but I used that as an example. I guess it is all relative.
Enter your email address to join: