Keep thinking on that. I'm out.Yes but we are taking about the rope coiled up on the pulley not the pulley itself . It changes the ratio and creates more work if it's longer.
Keep thinking on that. I'm out.Yes but we are taking about the rope coiled up on the pulley not the pulley itself . It changes the ratio and creates more work if it's longer.
If you don't believe it, try it for yourself. I just rebuilt a Poulan 5200. I could hardly pull it over. The rope was real short. I replaced the rope, filling up the whole pulley. It now starts like a normal saw.
Would it be worth while to add some sea foam to the fuel and see if it would remove any built up carbon?
Yes but we are taking about the rope coiled up on the pulley not the pulley itself . It changes the ratio and creates more work if it's longer. Did you ever notice the first foot is the hardest, cut off a foot and eliminate it. Like I say I have 3 big 4 stroke engines with short ropes because they broke they pull way easier now. So I will hold my position on this.
If you don't believe it, try it for yourself. I just rebuilt a Poulan 5200. I could hardly pull it over. The rope was real short. I replaced the rope, filling up the whole pulley. It now starts like a normal saw.
You lose mechanical advantage then you decrease the distance of your lever arm (think short vs long torque wrench). Same idea with the recoil on the saw or your mower. Because the rope is coiled on top of itself in the recoil pulley when you add more rope you increase the diameter of said pulley and lengthen the distance between the crank shaft and the point that force is being applied. More leverage = more mechanical advantage = easier starts.
I will try it on a saw today. I owned a lawn care business for 15 years with big walk behind mowers ropes broke alot while on the job we just tied the handles back on. the shorter the rope the easier the pull. Unless there's some major difference in the design.
There are rules and laws in my world.Sorry but your wrong. Let's put it this way ,the more rope coiled up on the starter for each revolution of the starter you may turn the crank shaft 4 times ,less rope you may turn it 2 or 3 per starter revolution a 1:4 ratio is harder to pull than a 1:2. ever wonder why the starter gear on your car or truck is so small?
ReadyStart® starting system
No priming. No choking. No worries. Just pull for power. The ReadyStart® starting system is a mechanism that automatically senses engine temperature to deliver the appropriate air/fuel mixture under all starting conditions.
• ReadyStart® starting system automatically supplies the right amount of fuel to the engine for easy starts
• High-output ignition coil for more charge with less effort
• Shorter pull rope maximizes leverage, minimizes effort
got this off brigg's web site
Course what could have happened was they increased the size of the rope pulley and used a shorter rope.
ReadyStart® starting system
No priming. No choking. No worries. Just pull for power. The ReadyStart® starting system is a mechanism that automatically senses engine temperature to deliver the appropriate air/fuel mixture under all starting conditions.
• ReadyStart® starting system automatically supplies the right amount of fuel to the engine for easy starts
• High-output ignition coil for more charge with less effort
• Shorter pull rope maximizes leverage, minimizes effort
got this off brigg's web site
I couldn't agree more!This is REALLY too Simple to argue.
While I agree with what you are trying to say, the way you said it is WRONG. The starter pulley would compare to the REAR cogs on a bike, Not the front chainrings.
On a bike, smaller front chainrings pedal easier (but give less speed), larger front chainrings give more possibility of speed (but pedal 'harder'). The bike/ automotive starter comparisons are confusing to Some because they introduce compound reduction instead of the simple lever that a saw starter pulley IS. This is REALLY too Simple to argue.
Enter your email address to join: