I like, pie!
Old Motocross rider are you ? Sounds correct .
These sort of "discussions" have about killed this site
A generalization such as this is difficult to quantify but I personally believe that "on average" meaning not all saws but quite a few, it seems that Stihls seem more "torquey" and Husqvarnas seem to run "fast". I think that difference is why some people prefer Stihls and others prefer Huskys (of those that have actually used both brands)
It comes down to what saw you prefer.
You would not believe how many phone calls I get from people asking me whether they should get a Stihl or a Husky.
90% of the time I tell them that they should try out both of the saws in question in wood, and see which one feels better in their hand.
The biggest thing I see in in durability. Stihls seem to be tougher.
That's a fact Jack!!!!!!It comes down to what saw you prefer.
You would not believe how many phone calls I get from people asking me whether they should get a Stihl or a Husky.
90% of the time I tell them that they should try out both of the saws in question in wood, and see which one feels better in their hand.
The biggest thing I see in in durability. Stihls seem to be tougher.
Stihl owners make better Prime Rib.It comes down to what saw you prefer.
You would not believe how many phone calls I get from people asking me whether they should get a Stihl or a Husky.
90% of the time I tell them that they should try out both of the saws in question in wood, and see which one feels better in their hand.
The biggest thing I see in in durability. Stihls seem to be tougher.
Yes, but in reality it's no different than Massachusetts or New Hampshire lobster. Even Canadian lobster is alright though.Is lobster from Maine any good?
Enter your email address to join: