Echo 7310 or husky 572

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
MinnesotaJon

MinnesotaJon

ArboristSite Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
77
Location
Minnesota
Hello first post! I am in the market for a new saw. I have been running a 575xp for years and it is getting pretty beat up. It’s still hanging in there but I want a new one to go with it. Been looking at these two saws wondering what everyone thinks. I like husky’s I just don’t know about the auto tune will it last fifteen years like my other saw.
 
Timber MacFallen

Timber MacFallen

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
258
Location
Massachusetts
Hello first post! I am in the market for a new saw. I have been running a 575xp for years and it is getting pretty beat up. It’s still hanging in there but I want a new one to go with it. Been looking at these two saws wondering what everyone thinks. I like husky’s I just don’t know about the auto tune will it last fifteen years like my other saw.
The Husky has the slight edge in cut speed/power from what I've seen, but the Echo is equally smooth (handle vibration) reports a member here who has tested both.

In terms of weight the Husky has a small edge, but it may not be noticeable. The big ergonomic/usability thing for me is the old fashioned toggle kill switch on the Echo. The Husky uses a "return to start" modern kill switch. I own saws with both and prefer the modern setup.

Heated handles are available on the Husky but not on the Echo.

My choice would likely come down to which dealer I trust more locally and who will support me when I need it. Price difference isn't that big in the real world. My Husky dealer gets $850 for a 572XP.

I own both Echo and Husky saws and I'm an Echo fan, but I think I'd probably go Husky here if all else is equal. They built that 572XP like a tank on the bottom end and reliability reports have been positive. You can get a five year warranty on the Husky as well if you buy a gallon of their fuel at purchase.
 
RED-85-Z51

RED-85-Z51

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
4,279
Location
USA
If you arent commercial. Echo offers a 5yr warranty and doesn't require you to buy their oil to qualify for it. The echo is a new design but its not electronic so you or most any shop could easily accomplish fuel system service for years to come if needed. Id give the mod to the echo for those reasons alone. Simple is good.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
 
Andyshine77
Joined
Jan 25, 2004
Messages
11,305
Location
Cincinnati, OH
I own both and like them both. If you cut dusty/dry wood I'd give the Echo the nod. Other than that I prefer the 572, and if you look around they can be had for not much more than the Echo. When you get some experience with auto adjusting saws, you realize how nice it is to never have to mess with carb adjustments.

Well that's my $.02


 
Paul Silvestri
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
858
Location
S.W Montana
I too was going back and forth on those two saws and funny enough I decide on the 372xp x-torq. Not because I think it’s better than the 7310 or 572 but just because it’s probably up there in the top three of the most reliable and easy to maintain saws around that still performs with the newer 70cc offerings. Like mentioned above, parts are everywhere and inexpensive to purchase and if desired you get lots of gains from that saw via porting and what not.

Think of the 372 xp as the glock of chainsaws or even the 1911 of chainsaws!! LOL. Sometimes low tech is the best tech.

The damn things just run.
 
MinnesotaJon

MinnesotaJon

ArboristSite Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
77
Location
Minnesota
I think I am leaning toward the 572xp just because I have only had husky’s. I was curious though if you do a muffler mod how does that work with auto tune. I have googled this some and haven’t really found anything.
 
RED-85-Z51

RED-85-Z51

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
4,279
Location
USA
I too was going back and forth on those two saws and funny enough I decide on the 372xp x-torq. Not because I think it’s better than the 7310 or 572 but just because it’s probably up there in the top three of the most reliable and easy to maintain saws around that still performs with the newer 70cc offerings. Like mentioned above, parts are everywhere and inexpensive to purchase and if desired you get lots of gains from that saw via porting and what not.

Think of the 372 xp as the glock of chainsaws or even the 1911 of chainsaws!! LOL. Sometimes low tech is the best tech.

The damn things just run.
Never liked the XTorq saws...saw enough early failures to make my stomach turn just saying the name. The nonXT xp saws run great

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
 
Paul Silvestri
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
858
Location
S.W Montana
Never liked the XTorq saws...saw enough early failures to make my stomach turn just saying the name. The nonXT xp saws run great

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
I’m sure you know better than me but what failures were so prevalent that your stomach turned? I know the OE edition was very very solid but it’s seems the x-torqs have been out a very long time also now, and seems to be very reliable. But again, I’m not a pro logger or arborist. So I’m sure I won’t use mine extensively enough to experience the said failures.
 
RED-85-Z51

RED-85-Z51

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
4,279
Location
USA
I’m sure you know better than me but what failures were so prevalent that your stomach turned? I know the OE edition was very very solid but it’s seems the x-torqs have been out a very long time also now, and seems to be very reliable. But again, I’m not a pro logger or arborist. So I’m sure I won’t use mine extensively enough to experience the said failures.
Just alot of mechanical failures, bearings, saws that would be otherwise running perfectly well and then melt down....they did seem to run well. I rarely see xtorq saws anymore, the first iterations.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
 
Paul Silvestri
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
858
Location
S.W Montana
Just alot of mechanical failures, bearings, saws that would be otherwise running perfectly well and then melt down....they did seem to run well. I rarely see xtorq saws anymore, the first iterations.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
Did they (husqvarna) make improvements over the years? Mine is from 2018
 
RED-85-Z51

RED-85-Z51

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
4,279
Location
USA
Did they (husqvarna) make improvements over the years? Mine is from 2018
Im sure they did, had to or they wouldn't be able to sell a saw anymore. I just remember...the seemingly neverending supply of broken xtorq branded equipment...im sure they fixed the issues after a few years but they were sure resistant to taking responsibility years ago

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
 
Ryan'smilling

Ryan'smilling

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
3,389
Location
Western WI
I think I am leaning toward the 572xp just because I have only had husky’s. I was curious though if you do a muffler mod how does that work with auto tune. I have googled this some and haven’t really found anything.

Autotune will compensate for a muffler mod without any issue.

It'll also compensate for running a little extra oil in your mix, which is the solution for bearing problems in the 372xt. The 372 was updated to meet emissions standards, and they added a new top end with a considerably heavier piston to an existing platform. The 572 was designed with its piston and cylinder from the beginning, so it shouldn't have the same problems. By the way, there's tons of x-torq saws out there. Hell, you can still buy a new 372 if you want.
 
Lionsfan

Lionsfan

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
1,801
Location
Cheboygan, MI
6
Autotune will compensate for a muffler mod without any issue.

It'll also compensate for running a little extra oil in your mix, which is the solution for bearing problems in the 372xt. The 372 was updated to meet emissions standards, and they added a new top end with a considerably heavier piston to an existing platform. The 572 was designed with its piston and cylinder from the beginning, so it shouldn't have the same problems. By the way, there's tons of x-torq saws out there. Hell, you can still buy a new 372 if you want.
I can't believe HVA put it back on the market. Didn't anyone tell them that Echo is the new king of the 70cc class?
 
MinnesotaJon

MinnesotaJon

ArboristSite Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
77
Location
Minnesota
Autotune will compensate for a muffler mod without any issue.

It'll also compensate for running a little extra oil in your mix, which is the solution for bearing problems in the 372xt. The 372 was updated to meet emissions standards, and they added a new top end with a considerably heavier piston to an existing platform. The 572 was designed with its piston and cylinder from the beginning, so it shouldn't have the same problems. By the way, there's tons of x-torq saws out there. Hell, you can still buy a new 372 if you want.
How heavy can you run the mix in an auto tune saw I have always just run 35:1.
 

Latest posts

Top