543XP's have shipped!

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
There is nothing in any specs I have seen that indicate that. but I may not have seen the final one?



Obviously he is!
OK - not sure why this would be interesting. it's just an rpm used to set the fuel mixture, and doesn't really mean anything about the rpms the saw runs under load.
 
Well it doesn't really resemble a redmax, im wondering how it will perform in stock configuration
 
Well it doesn't really resemble a redmax, im wondering how it will perform in stock configuration

It is orange instead of red, but it's otherwise very similar:

gz4300ez-1efdea6d.png


543xp-jpg.341842


Someone posted a partial tear-down on a Japanese site a while back, and the saws looked nearly identical. The Husky had a metal chain catcher (instead of plastic), but that was the only apparent difference. Of course there could be some differences in the porting or other changes that boost the performance of the orange version. Presumably the Husky also has the advantage of better dealer support.

Just to be clear I have nothing against Japanese saws in general or Redmax/Zenoah in particular. They make some very nice small saws!

Doug
 
I have heard so many great things about them but only the blowers and trimmers the saws are common here with support but they are not popular for some reason.
this should be quite interesting. can't wait for a video.
 
It is orange instead of red, but it's otherwise very similar:

gz4300ez-1efdea6d.png


543xp-jpg.341842


Someone posted a partial tear-down on a Japanese site a while back, and the saws looked nearly identical. The Husky had a metal chain catcher (instead of plastic), but that was the only apparent difference. Of course there could be some differences in the porting or other changes that boost the performance of the orange version. Presumably the Husky also has the advantage of better dealer support.
.....

Doug

I notised the same a while ago, and wasn't surpriced at all, based on how the 543xp looks.
 
I am looking forward to seeing one in person, will probably be a while before any dealers around me have one in stock.
 
Here's the GZ4300 in action (together with its smaller sibling, the GZ 3900). It's a strato design, with a semi-split carb.
The Japanese versions come with a Sugihara bar. Nice! :clap:I wonder how long it will take for these bars to pop up on eBay.



Doug
 
The offset cylinder is interesting. That will be something to think about for a bit..... Somewhere in the dark corners of my memory I believe I recall that being done somewhere before - the BMC A engine maybe? I'm curious what the tradeoffs are, especially in relation to a 2-stroke.
 
The offset cylinder is interesting. That will be something to think about for a bit..... Somewhere in the dark corners of my memory I believe I recall that being done somewhere before - the BMC A engine maybe? I'm curious what the tradeoffs are, especially in relation to a 2-stroke.

It's old hat. Just marketing. Look up "desaxe"
 
Bob, I remember running your lil 242. Mean little Saw for sure! Id be surprised to see 16000 rpm, but just the thought of a engine revving up that high makes me smile. I must have a disease, I love engines!
 
Well, that's the question I've been asking from the beginning. The 550 is so sweet, why do we need the 543? And it's not just the 550, cause the 545 has more power than the 543 and costs less. There are times that a 242XP is just the perfect saw to run, and I'm glad I've got a couple. So, if the 543 can keep up with a 242, then there is a market for it. I sharpened up my 242's last night in anticipation of the upcoming grudge match. :laugh: (My money's on the 242)

But back when the 242 was on the market, the next step up was the 254, and the difference in weight between the 2 was more significant than comparing the 550 and 543. Sort of like the MS241 and MS261 today.

From the 2014 catalog, here are the specs. (I must be feeling Norwegian this morning lol)

543- 2.95hp; 9.9 lbs.

545-3.3hp; 10.8 lbs.

550-3.7lbs; 10.8 lbs.

445- 2.8hp; 11.2 lbs.

Compared to the 445, it looks real good. About the same power, but nice and light. Compared to the 550, or even the 545, I think you give up too much power for a smaller savings in weight.

I think it's going to come down to what are you actually going to use it for. A light saw for climbing, bucket work and other limbing tasks. For that it makes sense. If you want to cut firewood with it, then the 545 is a far better choice.

I'm also anxious to tach this saw, as I've heard conflicting reports about what RPM's they are going to run at. 15,000? 16,000?

I love my 545 it will probably get a little muffler modding in a year or two.
 
It's old hat. Just marketing. Look up "desaxe"
Thanks! I did not realize it had become common. It may offer some unique advantages (?) in a 2-stroke though.

If the offset as shown in the video is correct, it will increase the leverage on the power stroke, but shorten the number of degrees. That would be OK, since the pressure driving the piston has gone before BDC anyway. I'm still trying to visualize what happens to the port timing - I think it effectively makes the timing asymmetrical.
 
Thanks! I did not realize it had become common. It may offer some unique advantages (?) in a 2-stroke though.

If the offset as shown in the video is correct, it will increase the leverage on the power stroke, but shorten the number of degrees. That would be OK, since the pressure driving the piston has gone before BDC anyway. I'm still trying to visualize what happens to the port timing - I think it effectively makes the timing asymmetrical.

You can also accomplish this by offset wrist pins.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top