oldirty
Addicted to ArboristSite
dont mind him, he's a truck driver.
:agree2:
It is hard to tell, but the other trees in this group look stressed also. It is so sad when people do not understand the importance of protection for trees they desire to save during construction. There is much more to saving a tree than simply not cutting it down.
Estimates are free. An arborist on site should be able to tell you exactly what is going on. Pictures only tell us part of the story and many times there are subtleties that we may miss that will be obvious to an experienced professional onsite.
Sylvia
Since I don't think an arborist would be able to talk me into paying to have the tree taken down I would not feel right having them come out for a free estimate. When I ask a question on this sight many others can learn from the answers so that is a bennifit to more than just myself.
I am very instrested in saving the other trees and I have payed to have someone out to look at stressed trees at my last house and unlike the tree service I was not impressed with their recomendations. I would be willing to pay to save the other trees but from my past experiance I don't see what anyone could tell me other than water and fertilizer. However, I am much more open minded to this aspect than paying to have the tree cut. So am I correct that it would not be right to bring someone out under these circimstances?
Better late than never.I am very instrested in saving the other trees
Since I don't think an arborist would be able to talk me into paying to have the tree taken down I would not feel right having them come out for a free estimate. When I ask a question on this sight many others can learn from the answers so that is a bennifit to more than just myself.
I am very instrested in saving the other trees and I have payed to have someone out to look at stressed trees at my last house and unlike the tree service I was not impressed with their recomendations. I would be willing to pay to save the other trees but from my past experiance I don't see what anyone could tell me other than water and fertilizer. However, I am much more open minded to this aspect than paying to have the tree cut. So am I correct that it would not be right to bring someone out under these circimstances?
I'm not a big fan of wait and see. If the owner cares enough to invest resources then a lot more can be done.So sometimes the only answers are to mulch, irrigate correctly and wait and see. (I'm not a fan of fertilizing stressed trees.)
Sylvia
[
Repairing Damaged Bark and Trunk Wounds
"Often the bark may be damaged along the trunk or major limbs. If that happens, remove the loose bark. Jagged edges can be cut away with a sharp knife. Take care not to cut into living tissues."
I agree with most of what you said (and don't want to offend) but the above is crap from the 60's and earlier like removing branches flush to trunk and cutting oliptical holes in the bark; all bad practice.
The tree will try and grow new cambium on the existing xylem (even on the phloem if it is kept moist) the last thing it needs is some good-doer with a shart knife making the wound the correct shape.
I have tied damaged bark back on branches and covered with black plastic to keep it warm and moist and very often the bark grafts; if not at least the xylem is kept alive so new phloem can form. What's wrong with jagged edges?
I saw a local sreet tree hit by a car and about 3' of bark removed all the way around, but only a small amount of wood damaged. Rather than just putting it back on it was carted away. The tree was forming blisters of new cells all over the wood; after a few weeks there was the first connection to feed the roots. But some qualified bozo from the council come out and removed the jagged edges and damaged some xylem and destroyed the bridge and any chance of the trees servival. The tree tried again by shooting from below the brake. I stopped on day and decided I would give it another few days before I did a bridge graft but out he came again and removed the suckers so the tree was removed.
I'm sure you are not recommending this sort of treatment but this is dangerous advice to give people with out extensive tree knowledge
"What About Fertilization?
Most experts recommend that you do not fertilize your trees the first year after construction damage. Water and mineral uptake may be reduced because of root damage. Excessive soil salts can draw water out of the roots and into the soil. In addition, nitrogen fertilization may stimulate top growth at the expense of root growth. It is a common misconception that applying fertilizer gives a stressed tree a much-needed shot in the arm. Fertilization should be based on the nutritional needs of trees on a site. Soils can be analyzed to determine whether any of the essential minerals are deficient. If soil nutrients are deficient, supplemental fertilization may be indicated. It is advisable to keep application rates low until the root system has had time to adjust."/QUOTE]
Sure it is theoretically possible to dehydrate a tree by adding salts to the soil and perhaps large amounts of artificial fertilizer could do this. But really if a tree has had major root damage it needs to grow lots of new root hairs and grow lots of new Mycorrhizal fungi and it has been shown that sea weed fertizers promote this. I add them in low levels with several aplications.
:agree2: No need to overengineer, I think it could be fell safely, and accurately without any rope or extra equipment, but I have no idea of his skill level with a saw, reading trees or using wedges, so I gave the most foolproof way I know of to safely bring it down. Hey maybe the arborist that's coming out can help him.
Okay, you guys have sold me on the idea of calling someone out to save the other trees. I will tell them to charge me a consulting fee because I plan to cut the dead tree but want input on the health of the other trees.
Enter your email address to join: