Thor's Hammer
ArboristSite Guru
Dan (TreeCo) posted this elsewhere. My opinion doesent count of course because I'm a dealer for said product, however I will try to answer to the best of my ability. Watch out though! I'm just a dealer out to line my pockets!
I've been watching Dynamic since they started several years ago but where are all of the end users talking about Dynamic? All the feedback I've ever heard is from salesmen out to line their pockets.
I bet the early Conehead buyers are scratching their heads seeing that design has been dropped. Sounds like an expensive lesson to me and a good reason to wait and see what is next.
1. I have seen several happy end user's of Dynamics chippers in the archives.
2. I assume you are refering the the new 'Discone' chippers Vs the 'ConeHead' style.
The discone machines have recntly been released to fit the 12" end of the market. This is because the double cone design is very expensive to produce, requiring up to 35 hours to manufacture. I've posted pics of this, a LOT of work goes into that head. On a smaller machine, this makes it cost ineffective to manufacture. On a larger machine, it makes better financial sense to have the double cone head. so the 15" capacity upwards are fitted with the same head as always. Not an expensive lesson at all.
I've been watching Dynamic since they started several years ago but where are all of the end users talking about Dynamic? All the feedback I've ever heard is from salesmen out to line their pockets.
I bet the early Conehead buyers are scratching their heads seeing that design has been dropped. Sounds like an expensive lesson to me and a good reason to wait and see what is next.
1. I have seen several happy end user's of Dynamics chippers in the archives.
2. I assume you are refering the the new 'Discone' chippers Vs the 'ConeHead' style.
The discone machines have recntly been released to fit the 12" end of the market. This is because the double cone design is very expensive to produce, requiring up to 35 hours to manufacture. I've posted pics of this, a LOT of work goes into that head. On a smaller machine, this makes it cost ineffective to manufacture. On a larger machine, it makes better financial sense to have the double cone head. so the 15" capacity upwards are fitted with the same head as always. Not an expensive lesson at all.