Peacock
Addicted to ArboristSite
There are times when I think we should have saved a few trillion dollars and let the Russians have the rest of Europe after WWII.
:yourock:
There are times when I think we should have saved a few trillion dollars and let the Russians have the rest of Europe after WWII.
You mean a Trabant?
That car made of some type of toxic plastic and cardboard combination, and was a death trap in collisions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oF4phDLfGF4&NR=1
So with the help of of some recent 361 vs. 440 debate threads,I decided to go with the 440.
However, the 441 @ 14.5 lbs. is on the Sthil web site but no 440. So they have already discontinued it except for remaining dealer inventory?
Now the question every one is tired of...I'm considering the 372 (70 cc) or go maybe just going back to "a sure thing" ..the 361 @(59 cc).
Although I'm finding it hard to get my hands around the notion that a 59 cc and a 70 cc saw can be compared?? (Not trying to hash up the debate just talking numbers). My only reference is my 290 @ 56.5cc..which if it wasn't in pieces waiting for a new p/C would still be the one saw....am I catching that CAD thing?
Anyway, what about the the 390? Is it a pain to work on as it's not a pro saw? I'm not logging but end up bucking/felling some pretty fat old oaks on my property(much of 15 -20+ inches diameter) & most of the free wood I get from friends is mature, pretty beefy hard wood ( i love free wood!).
I'm sending out this thread and then have to sign off ..so I'll check on REPS Sunday.
Thanks for your opinions in advance.
Enter your email address to join: