Now that Blitz is gone, who makes a decent small gas can?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
StihlyinEly

StihlyinEly

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
3,967
Location
Ely, Minn.
The former Blitz design was so unpopulat that they have changed the design again.

http://www.blitzusa.com/hande/g2.html

My Dad just got one of the new Blitz design cans. We hated it so much I just gave him one of my older plastic 2.5-gallon cans, and he's much happier. How many millions of dollars have gone into designing a "better" gas can over the years, and pissing off gazillions of folks who use gas cans? :monkey:

I'll look at the Jill video now and then, but won't buy any newfangled cans. :D
 

CWME

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
999
Location
Gorham, Maine
I have spent about the price of an Eagle can on the junk ones and replacement parts. I have one servicable plastic 2.5 gal left. Once that one quits I am buying eagle metal cans. Those look like they will last more than a few fillups before the springs break, the end snaps off, or the whole nozle comes off dumping a gal or better before it can be righted etc etc. The last time I put fuel in my boat I dumped about a gallon of fuel everywhere because the stupid thing broke off:sick:

These :poop:cans have to be designed by politicians. Supposed to prevent spills but do the exact opposite.
 
foxtrapper

foxtrapper

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
49
Location
USA
Supposed to prevent spills but do the exact opposite.
They are actually designed to auto close, not to prevent spills. Spills was (and still is) considered inconsequential. It wa the vapor loss due to vent caps being left open that was the concern. California and US EPA both. That's why all the new cans completely seal up when you set them down.
 
dswensen

dswensen

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
929
Location
SW Washington State
They are actually designed to auto close, not to prevent spills. Spills was (and still is) considered inconsequential. It wa the vapor loss due to vent caps being left open that was the concern. California and US EPA both. That's why all the new cans completely seal up when you set them down.

I'm not doubting you for a second, but COME ON!! Vapor loss??? Really?? What about the "vapor loss" from the gas I always spill with these silly things. Makes about as much sense as the rubber condoms around the filler spouts at the gas stations. Freakin' greenie weenies.

Well maybe "vapor loss" what killed off the dinosaurs ... :confused:

(rant mode OFF)
 
foxtrapper

foxtrapper

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
49
Location
USA
I'm not doubting you for a second, but COME ON!! Vapor loss??? Really?? What about the "vapor loss" from the gas I always spill with these silly things. (rant mode OFF)

Well, during the regulation development having a can as badly designed as the Blitz wasn't anticipated. All that was being considered was a can that would seal up automatically if you weren't using it. All in all, not a bad thought.

The problem really isn't the regulation, it's the gas can that Blitz came up with. If the Blitz can would have been an obscure lousy design, it wouldn't have mattered. But it quickly became a very popular gas can, sold by Walmarts and the like everywhere.
 
BloodOnTheIce

BloodOnTheIce

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Nov 7, 2007
Messages
3,781
Location
Western, NY
KenJax Tree

KenJax Tree

Terraphobic
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
11,593
Location
Over there
Loss of vapor could be considered a spill. What does it have to do with my point? :msp_rolleyes:

On second thought, explain to me why these stupid cans are called "No Spill" if it is not to prevent a spill? :popcorn:

By you pushing the button you're controlling the flow of gas therefore you don't overfill your equipment preventing a spill and we now have a NO-SPILL gas can.
 
zogger

zogger

Tree Freak
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
16,456
Location
North Georgia
Buy some cans of premix. Use them up. You now have real nice cans, pour easy, even into some of the more hard to reach older saw small fuel openings. Use any old cheap can to buy and mix in, then immediately transfer it to the one quart size premix metal cans ( I use a funnel that fits nice on the top). They seal well, pour super easy, and you can carry them in a jacket pocket.
 
tallguys

tallguys

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
2,044
Location
Ontario, Canada
Buy some cans of premix. Use them up. You now have real nice cans, pour easy, even into some of the more hard to reach older saw small fuel openings. Use any old cheap can to buy and mix in, then immediately transfer it to the one quart size premix metal cans ( I use a funnel that fits nice on the top). They seal well, pour super easy, and you can carry them in a jacket pocket.

And best of all they don't cost anything extra. Good idea.
 
Arrowhead

Arrowhead

RARE BREED
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Messages
13,874
Location
Illinois
3567447768_4f66505736.jpg


Ooops... wrong can.
 
LegDeLimber

LegDeLimber

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
2,174
Location
NC
WTF!!
Darwin candidate(s) pour gas on a fire and then sue Blitz & Wally world ???
Plastics News - Beleaguered gas can manufacturer Blitz USA closing down

Couple of vids even.
Epic fail pouring gas on fire guy runs with flaming gas can - YouTube
lower your volume first on this next one, idiots put some loud crap music on it.
Awesome fume flash off though.
FAIL: Idiot Uses Gasoline To Burn Some Branches In His Backyard! - YouTube
Oh what the heck, one more. the ending shot of the scattered woodpile is impressive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w09IY73oVjE&feature=related
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top