I love it when someone says "yada yada, fast hydraulic, blah blah, beats a super split".
Basically it isn't true and it isn't a fair comparison for either type of machine.
Cycle time is only part of the story.
Fuel used is another part.
Cost is another part.
Type of operation is another part.
Short of commercial production machines, pushing 30+ hp to the splitter circuit, there isn't much out there that will allow one person to split as much wood per day.
Now, if I had a hydraulic splitter I would add a four way or eight way wedge to it and run it. Cost of getting a SS would not be justified unless it was a commercial operation. I'd also add a work table and probably a log lift. Another option would be to sell the hydro and buy a SS.
If I was buying my first splitter I would hold out for a SS type machine. I've yet to meet anyone who regretted buying one. (Speeco guys don't regret function, only durability and lack of service, from reading that thread.)
As to homeowner or commercial users, a huge part of your operation is in layout and procedures. How often do you touch the wood? Does the product flow smoothly through your operation? Are you ever tripping over machines or product in the way? The splitter is only one part of the picture. In the end, in all sizes and types of operations, I've seen and heard of SS and like machines increasing output and quality of product.
Anybody that doesn't have time running both is really only running their mouth.
Mr. HE