Stihl MS660 vs Husqvarna 390xp (vid)

[Boogieman142]

Ok, I'm going to stick my neck out here. The only way a stock 044 would outcut a ported 066 is if the operator of the 066 forgot to take down the rakers for the past few filings.

 

[AUSSIE1]

and my 044 may out cut both of those, but if you would have been paying attention i stated it has a 30 inch bar, i believe if i put a 32 inch bar on my 044 in simular wood i might not, your a punk, prolly piss your pants if you were within a hundred feet of me, the wood they were cutting wasnt big, whatcha gonna do if my 044 does out cut those saws in simular wood? and the most retarded part about you, and this post of yours, is my 044 against those saws was never the point, the point i was making , you mental midget, assclown cock sucker, is that those saws were not truly being tested, in order to truly test them and give a true gauge of there torque would to be putting a bigger bar and chain on it, or putting it into hardwood, but you got distracted from the main point, because you suffer from a condition known as mentasl retardation. punk.

I'd say you just hung yourself fella.

Good.

 

[BarkBuster20]

I'd say you just hung yourself fella.

Good.

you can say whatever you want
dont mean ####

 

[BC_Logger]

BarkBuster20 what exactly is your life experience with the use of saws and what is it that you do you a living if i may ask

 

[BarkBuster20]

BarkBuster20 what exactly is your life experience with the use of saws and what is it that you do you a living if i may ask

i started cutting firewood when i was about 14, have pruned fruit trees for the past 6 years, thinned timber, for about a year, and have been cutting firewood full time for the past 2 years, as in for the main part of my income.

 

[Freehand]

and my 044 may out cut both of those, but if you would have been paying attention i stated it has a 30 inch bar, i believe if i put a 32 inch bar on my 044 in simular wood i might not, your a punk, prolly piss your pants if you were within a hundred feet of me, the wood they were cutting wasnt big, whatcha gonna do if my 044 does out cut those saws in simular wood? and the most retarded part about you, and this post of yours, is my 044 against those saws was never the point, the point i was making , you mental midget, assclown cock sucker, is that those saws were not truly being tested, in order to truly test them and give a true gauge of there torque would to be putting a bigger bar and chain on it, or putting it into hardwood, but you got distracted from the main point, because you suffer from a condition known as mentasl retardation. punk.

Your main point was erroneous to begin with....subjective,steeped in conjecture and of no good end to anyone here...most notably yourself.

Nice vid Jasha,great thread ,with one imbecile excluded.

 

[BarkBuster20]

Your main point was erroneous to begin with....subjective,steeped in conjecture and of no good end to anyone here...most notably yourself.

Nice vid Jasha,great thread ,with one imbecile excluded.

well, i believe your slightly ill informed, slingr himself said the 660 will outcut the 390 with larger bar in bigger wood, and what is the main reason to get a big chainsaw? for large wood. so the 660 is the superior saw if your using the saw to cut big nasty stuff. but if your just going by the test you would think the 390 was superior, i got attacked when i made a simple statement.

 

[BarkBuster20]

Your main point was erroneous to begin with....subjective,steeped in conjecture and of no good end to anyone here...most notably yourself.

Nice vid Jasha,great thread ,with one imbecile excluded.

please explain how you think my main point was erroneous? i said the test was pointless with that small softwood and those 32 inch 3/8 bars, and slingr himself admitted that the 390 loses to the 660 in bigger wood with bigger bar? what about what i said was erroneous, my main point is plenty valid.

 

[MR4WD]

and my 044 may out cut both of those, but if you would have been paying attention i stated it has a 30 inch bar, i believe if i put a 32 inch bar on my 044 in simular wood i might not, your a punk, prolly piss your pants if you were within a hundred feet of me, the wood they were cutting wasnt big, whatcha gonna do if my 044 does out cut those saws in simular wood? and the most retarded part about you, and this post of yours, is my 044 against those saws was never the point, the point i was making , you mental midget, assclown cock sucker, is that those saws were not truly being tested, in order to truly test them and give a true gauge of there torque would to be putting a bigger bar and chain on it, or putting it into hardwood, but you got distracted from the main point, because you suffer from a condition known as mentasl retardation. punk.

I'm quite confident I could jerk a half hitch in your stupid a$$. That's not the point though, the point is you shot your mouth and now you're backing down from a point you failed to make. While in the world knows you can't compare long stroke torque with high revving hp, you can't deny the fact that either of these saws rip. Both kick my 3120's butt in small wood, dress them in 50" .404, things will be different.

That's not the point. Both of these saws are impressive. It's a good point for the target audience (this website) that you don't need a big heavy 660 to devastate large wood like the 390 does.

I'm not replying to you again unless you buy a dictionary, thesaurus and go back to grade 3 for the 5th time, you illiterate imbecile.

 

[BarkBuster20]

I'm quite confident I could jerk a half hitch in your stupid a$$. That's not the point though, the point is you shot your mouth and now you're backing down from a point you failed to make. While in the world knows you can't compare long stroke torque with high revving hp, you can't deny the fact that either of these saws rip. Both kick my 3120's butt in small wood, dress them in 50" .404, things will be different.

That's not the point. Both of these saws are impressive. It's a good point for the target audience (this website) that you don't need a big heavy 660 to devastate large wood like the 390 does.

I'm not replying to you again unless you buy a dictionary, thesaurus and go back to grade 3 for the 5th time, you illiterate imbecile.

well, your confidence dont mean ####, i would make you look like a scared rabbit. and i never said a bad thing about either saw, there both good saws. and no i never failed to make a point, your just not smart enough to have seen it. i never tried to deny either of the saws rip. and i am most certainly not backing down from any point, your delusional. my point was simple the saws needed to be tested with bigger bars in bigger wood, not 50 inch bars, i stated 36 or 42 with .404 gauge, i also said it would be just fine for a 32 inch 3/8 to be used in hard wood, but if your goin to be using the saw to cut doug fir, and you run a 32 inch bar, you would be ahead to use a 70cc class saw. so that is why the test was worthless in my opinion, interesting, yes, but it has no meaning, because neither of those saws are required with that small of a bar in chain in softwood. also on another note, and another reason the test was worthless, is im sure the 660 would have outcut the 390 in hardwood with that same setup, considering it does with bigger bar and chain, the hardwood, would be far more taxing. so thats why i considerd it pointless, smokescreens, and mirrors.

i have given more than enough valid points, the only areas iv been attacked on are things that are totaly unrelated to what i was talking about, a lot of you obviously have hidden agenda. there was never any reason to attack me because i said the test was no good and my reasoning, nothing about it was offesive, so whats the deal? i hit a sensitive spot because you modders are scared of losing money.

 

[BC_Logger]

well, your confidence dont mean ####, i would make you look like a scared rabbit. and i never said a bad thing about either saw, there both good saws. and no i never failed to make a point, your just not smart enough to have seen it. i never tried to deny either of the saws rip. and i am most certainly not backing down from any point, your delusional. my point was simple the saws needed to be tested with bigger bars in bigger wood, not 50 inch bars, i stated 36 or 42 with .404 gauge, i also said it would be just fine for a 32 inch 3/8 to be used in hard wood, but if your goin to be using the saw to cut doug fir, and you run a 32 inch bar, you would be ahead to use a 70cc class saw. so that is why the test was worthless in my opinion, interesting, yes, but it has no meaning, because neither of those saws are required with that small of a bar in chain in softwood. also on another note, and another reason the test was worthless, is im sure the 660 would have outcut the 390 in hardwood with that same setup, considering it does with bigger bar and chain, the hardwood, would be far more taxing. so thats why i considerd it pointless, smokescreens, and mirrors.

i have given more than enough valid points, the only areas iv been attacked on are things that are totaly unrelated to what i was talking about, a lot of you obviously have hidden agenda. there was never any reason to attack me because i said the test was no good and my reasoning, nothing about it was offesive, so whats the deal? i hit a sensitive spot because you modders are scared of losing money.

32" bar, 8 tooth sprocket, same chain. 25" seasoned doug fir. is what the video states

a 70 cc saw is not going to be able to keep up sporting a 8 tooth sprocket on a 32 bar

it doesn't matter weather you test the saws with a 36 bar or a 42 the control was the same same bar, same chain, same sprocket, same log the only thing that changed was the power head.

I'm not to sure what your trying to explain but suggesting that you would be better off with a smaller cc saw is green horn bull ####. Any one who has run saws for any given length of time knows that if you want to cut faster you have to either mod it or get a bigger saw and up your sprocket size.

 

[parrisw]

i believe my 044 revs out higher than either the husky or the 066, im not completely sure on this, but i didnt think the 660 would rev out higher than the 044. and since i have started all this crazy havoc, i will put up a video tomorrow, but i will be cutting bigger rounds of fir, just so i can be proved either wrong or right.

Nope, obviously you've never run a ported saw,

simular wood prolly piss wasnt big, simular wood? mentasl retardation

Could your please explain to me what these words mean??? I think you might suffer from this mentasl retardation thing that you talk about, even though I'm not exactly sure what it is.

 

[splitpost]

Wow what an arguement ,nice vid

 

[BarkBuster20]

Nope, obviously you've never run a ported saw,



Could your please explain to me what these words mean??? I think you might suffer from this mentasl retardation thing that you talk about, even though I'm not exactly sure what it is.

if you cant understand that, then you have problems, this isnt english class, parris hilton. again this goes back to you avoiding the actual point, you have said nothing that means anything, just trying to make yourself feel better about being a loser.

 

[parrisw]

I cant understand that, I have problems, I need english class, parris hilton. again this goes back to me avoiding the actual point, I have said nothing that means anything, just trying to make myself feel better about being a loser.

Hmm, glad you finally admitted it. Didn't your mommy every tell you not to call names, its not very nice you know.

Every time you spout off, you just make yourself look worse, seriously!! You should stop and be real.

 

[BarkBuster20]

32" bar, 8 tooth sprocket, same chain. 25" seasoned doug fir. is what the video states

a 70 cc saw is not going to be able to keep up sporting a 8 tooth sprocket on a 32 bar

it doesn't matter weather you test the saws with a 36 bar or a 42 the control was the same same bar, same chain, same sprocket, same log the only thing that changed was the power head.

I'm not to sure what your trying to explain but suggesting that you would be better off with a smaller cc saw is green horn bull ####. Any one who has run saws for any given length of time knows that if you want to cut faster you have to either mod it or get a bigger saw and up your sprocket size.

why do you put words into my mouth, i never said the 044 would be faster with an 8 tooth rim with 32 inch bar, in fact a specified just the opposite. what i said is that if your going to be cutting softwood with a 32 inch bar you would be ahead to have a 70cc class saw, not because its faster, but becauseits lighter and it will get the job done, theres more fellers around here using 70cc saws than not. and most of them have 32 inch bars. what i said was that in order for a 90cc saw to become nec when cutting softwood, is when you put a bigger bar and go up to .404 gauge, so based off of that logic, i concluded that what the saw will be worked with, should be what its tested with, and most people who would run a 32 inch 3/8 bar and chain on a 90cc saw, would be using it in hardwood, but the test was done in softwood. do you see what im saying? or do you want to go off topic again and try setting another smokescreen up to deter from the point?

 

[parrisw]

why do you put words into my mouth, i never said the 044 would be faster with an 8 tooth rim with 32 inch bar, in fact a specified just the opposite. what i said is that if your going to be cutting softwood with a 32 inch bar you would be ahead to have a 70cc class saw, not because its faster, but becauseits lighter and it will get the job done, theres more fellers around here using 70cc saws than not. and most of them have 32 inch bars. what i said was that in order for a 90cc saw to become nec when cutting softwood, is when you put a bigger bar and go up to .404 gauge, so based off of that logic, i concluded that what the saw will be worked with, should be what its tested with, and most people who would run a 32 inch 3/8 bar and chain on a 90cc saw, would be using it in hardwood, but the test was done in softwood. do you see what im saying? or do you want to go off topic again and try setting another smokescreen up to deter from the point?

Ya, you said your 044 would beat those saws in that exact wood.

 

[BarkBuster20]

Hmm, glad you finally admitted it. Didn't your mommy every tell you not to call names, its not very nice you know.

Every time you spout off, you just make yourself look worse, seriously!! You should stop and be real.

well you will get about as much respect from me as i get from you, if you didnt want to get your feelings hurt then maybe you shouldnt have started off with me, i never said anything to you till you said something to me. and the reason im not being "real" with you is because you skipped past everything that had to do with the point i was making and attacked me in a way that was enrelated to what i was talking about in order to try and discredit me.

 

[parrisw]

well you will get about as much respect from me as i get from you, if you didnt want to get your feelings hurt then maybe you shouldnt have started off with me, i never said anything to you till you said something to me. and the reason im not being "real" with you is because you skipped past everything that had to do with the point i was making and attacked me in a way that was enrelated to what i was talking about in order to try and discredit me.

Never said my feelings were hurt. LOL, I don't have to try and discredit you, you do a very good job of that.
Isn't your mom yelling at you by now to get off the computer and get to bed.

 

[BarkBuster20]

Ya, you said your 044 would beat those saws in that exact wood.

yes i did but again, why do you confuse the details? i specifically said that my saw would outcut those two saws in that size wood with a 30 inch bar, not with a 32 inch bar with a 8 tooth. and that is also why i said it would be irrelevent, because its not the same size bar. anything else your confused about?