woodgrenade
ArboristSite Guru
Wow, i'd say you put a fair amount of work into making that cant.
Aren't you a metric man Sawtroll?
I think you meant to say the 390XP is 252 grams lighter than the 660, or just over a pound
Not a pound, but otherwise you are right, according to the posted info!
5.2 + 3.8 = 9.0
The saws have been run, but the results are not in. I haven't had a chance to do anything with the vids yet. That's going to take a good while.
Here's the cant I made. It measures 29" wide x 17" tall x 48" long. I wanted to use the entire length of the 32" bar, minus clearance for the dawgs. This is the first time I ever tried anything like this. Getting the bottom slab out was a real pain!
There you beotches go having loads of fun again without me!!!
Mike
Well apparently it wasn't a blowout, or you would know without vids!!!
Mike
Good job Brad just watch that bloke in the background though - he'll knock your camera off and stick it on eBay when you're not looking...
Wow, i'd say you put a fair amount of work into making that cant.
Nice wood!!!
I am hoping this thread reaffirms what Jasha already posted sometime ago.
I went with a 390XP after reading all the quality issue threads with Stihl and for the better anti-vibe. I say all this having never run a 660 nor ever really having a need to run anything much bigger than a 24" bar.
:censored: You're right. 454 grams to a pound...
What was I thinking...
careful now Matt, you don't want to piss of "the beast"
That cant was a TON of work, especially the bottom cut. Then getting the slab out from under it was a huge challenge.
How did the tractor saw compare? And........ more testing tomorrow??
Hahaha I don't even know what to say about this pick, I'm not sure if I look cool, or more like a thespian.
I'd expect a ported 390 to be a hair faster than a 660 in that size wood, but the 660 is definately torquier, making it more user friendly IMHO. They're both AWESOME saws.
Enter your email address to join: