MS 241?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I see how close the 550 and 241 are PHO..but you have to consider that if you run picco on a 241 thats not as heavy as .325 and gives it additional weight savings over the 550 when they are both ready to work

I have 519.00 OTD for my 241..and still complained..its too much for a 40cc saw.
 
That's pretty heavy for a top handle saw. Great little saws though. All metal, no plastic. I have two:rock2:

Kinda of a Tweener. although technically a top handle, seems to be more spacing between front and top grab points, so it is almost a rear handle feel, to me anyway.

For the loot I have in mine, maybe 30 bucks including new fuel lines, etc..hard to beat for a small saw. Plenty of snot running the 16.
 
I see how close the 550 and 241 are PHO..but you have to consider that if you run picco on a 241 thats not as heavy as .325 and gives it additional weight savings over the 550 when they are both ready to work

I have 519.00 OTD for my 241..and still complained..its too much for a 40cc saw.

I would choose a 550 with a big 325 bar any day over a picco 241. It is just a far more competent saw without any real weight penalties.
 
I doubt they are lighter than magnesium or aluminum. It's a cost savings for profit margins more than anything else.


I don't know. Same exact item, made from plastic, aluminum, and magnesium, I think plastic is still the lighter weight of them all.

Of course, durability is a whole nother issue.
 
I don't know. Same exact item, made from plastic, aluminum, and magnesium, I think plastic is still the lighter weight of them all.

Of course, durability is a whole nother issue.

For the same width maybe. For the same strength, not necessarily. Afterall, all the other saws I mentioned that weighed as much, or less, than the 241(the SHindaiwas are actually a touch lighter) have aluminum handles and aluminum or magnesium clutch covers.
 
For the same width maybe. For the same strength, not necessarily. Afterall, all the other saws I mentioned that weighed as much, or less, than the 241(the SHindaiwas are actually a touch lighter) have aluminum handles and aluminum or magnesium clutch covers.


Agree! I meant that when I said durability.
 
It seems to me some on here are going to great lengths to justify spending $550+ on this saw.

I had a 420Dolmar a 401Dolmar and a Redmax3800. Now I just have the 3800. The 3800 was superior to the 401 in everyway. The 420 was a nice saw but too close to 50cc saw in weight. The 3800 is significantly lighter than a 241 and I bought two 3800 for less than one 241.

I use the 3800 constantly cutting cedar with 16 inch bar and Stihl ps chain. It is ideal for that job.

I agree with what you are saying but it all boils down to he wants a stihl. And the stihl dealer is close. I don't have another dealers that are worth a dam.
 
Plastic can be a fine material for many items. But, speaking specifically of chainsaws, we all know they don't get coddled and they get tossed around, bumped into other things like the ground, trees, pick-up beds, rocks and heavy-equipment, etc.

That being said, I prefer all the contact points on my chainsaws to be metal of some kind.
 
Plastic can be a fine material for many items. But, speaking specifically of chainsaws, we all know they don't get coddled and they get tossed around, bumped into other things like the ground, trees, pick-up beds, rocks and heavy-equipment, etc.

That being said, I prefer all the contact points on my chainsaws to be metal of some kind.
Unless working hot lines :dizzy:
 
Back
Top