661 Oil Test 32:1 vs 40:1 vs 50:1 ?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
He may be a wanker (I don't know the guy, no offense Walker) but you are a BSer. Your ramblings in the felling thread make me think you feel superior to everyone just because you argue. You have given little to no real world experience because you have none. Maybe you're 14 or 15 years old or maybe you only post during a drinking session but your posts are irrelevant and so are you. Don't bother responding, you are now on ignore
Are you a 16:1 user who thinks they can impossibly defeat gravity & swing a tree 180' from the lean with a soft dutchman then ? If that is the case then your response is perfectly understandable.
Thansk
 
Any time difference? I'm at work and can't watch without stopping to buffer.

ok times im getting are...
h1r 45:1 -
5.5
5.5
13.0
12.7

800 off road 45:1
5.8
5.7
12.7
12.5

I think larger wood, would show more difference. Had to pull 14hrs yesterday, but today is looking good so might be able to try motul 800 45:1 vs motul 800 32:1 for time only. Don't have the heat gun right now.
 
Maybe to someone without a clue such as your self. To someone knowledgeable it's pretty apparent Whitespider is the king of google..
And you aren't! LOL after this last page of dribble of you arguing black is white my comment was of genuine concern!
 
Just as I stated, both the MK262 and MK318 are special purpose, long range sniper rounds... not standard combat issue.
The MK262 is produced by Black Hills Ammunition (a long time, well known fact); here's a quote from Black Hills President Jeff Hoffman...
“The assaulters were stealing it from the snipers, so we had to make more.”
http://www.shootingtimes.com/ammo/special-forces-to-civilians-black-hills-mk-262-mod-1-review/

In a 2002 report by Shooting Times the explanation of how the hollow point gets around the Haque Convention restrictions...
"The MK 262 Mod 1 projectile is an open-tipped match (OTM) bullet, though it does not expand in the manner of a conventional hollowpoint. In fact, the hollow cavity is not there to induce expansion; it’s there to put the majority of weight towards the projectile’s rear so that it is more stable in flight and increase accuracy. Because it is not designed to expand and cause “undue suffering,” that critical phrase in the Hague Conventions regarding ammunition, the Navy’s Judge Advocate General Corps approved the round for use in combat. The same reasoning was applied to the Marine Corps 62-grain SOST round (MK 318), also an OTM design."
http://www.shootingtimes.com/ammo/special-forces-to-civilians-black-hills-mk-262-mod-1-review/

I can back-up everything I've stated six-ways from Sunday... so far all you've done is make unsupported claims based on nothing but your own belief in magic. I've even asked you a few questions that you just dance round, or attempt to change the subject, but don't answer... which seems to be your modus operandi whenever your called out. You're the one that tried to make the claim various military made the switch to jacketed bullets in order to obtain higher performance... I simply corrected you're ignorance with historical fact.

But I'm gonna' ask you one more question just to see what happens...
What does special purpose jacketed sniper bullets being more accurate than mass produce jacketed combat rounds (which is entirely expected) have to do with comparing cast bullet accuracy and performance to jacketed hunting bullet accuracy and performance??
And I'll re-ask you one also...
In the .30-06, exactly how much faster can you drive your copper-condomized bullet over the cast bullet??
Hey.. you're the one that labeled me a Luddite and made the (so far) totally unsupported claim...

Your arrogance is unfathomable... you believe everyone should take you at your word... just because it's your word.
Your arrogance blinds you to your own ignorance.



OK... I'm done now... my point has been made.
*
Well said.
thansk
 
I may give super M a try. I didn't want to bu ,a half gallon last time I was in the bike shop. They should have some more stuff in by now.
 
ok times im getting are...
h1r 45:1 -
5.5
5.5
13.0
12.7

800 off road 45:1
5.8
5.7
12.7
12.5

I think larger wood, would show more difference. Had to pull 14hrs yesterday, but today is looking good so might be able to try motul 800 45:1 vs motul 800 32:1 for time only. Don't have the heat gun right now.
Good work! I applaud your testing & depth of character to actually do, test & produce something of substance.
Thansk
 
ok times im getting are...
h1r 45:1 -
5.5
5.5
13.0
12.7

800 off road 45:1
5.8
5.7
12.7
12.5

I think larger wood, would show more difference. Had to pull 14hrs yesterday, but today is looking good so might be able to try motul 800 45:1 vs motul 800 32:1 for time only. Don't have the heat gun right now.
For all intents and purposes, those times are the same, well within the margin of error. I'm much more interest to see the 800 32:1 times.
 
19.png
this 2t appears to have dye ?
 
OK, in the interest of getting it back to oil related stuff and keeping things brief........ I am really liking the K2 at 40:1 in my chainsaws and other 2 stroke equipment. Seems to run really clean with very little smoke and smell. I swear that all my stuff idles and spools up better, and just plain runs better with it. I Could be in error, but my seat of the pants opinion is that it is the Cats arse.
My search for a better oil over the Stihl Ultra and Lucas ( Both of which worked quite well by the way) is over. I see no point in trying anything else at this point. This stuff is awesome.
The End. :numberone:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top