Well....
I got called into a meeting in the city this morning so I went to check out the ea3201 at the tool store.
I didn't buy it afterall.
Keep in mind I already have a PS420, which is a GREAT little saw.
The 3201 wasn't very much smaller at all in physical size than the 420 and it felt only slightly lighter. It's supposed to be about a pound. It felt like ounces to me.
I am looking for a significant difference.
Also, I didn't like the angle of the rear handle. It was too "flat" so my right wrist felt wrong and my hands felt slightly too close together. The 420 has beautiful ergos for me. The 5105 I got after the 420 has slightly different ergos, which surprised and disappointed me at the time. I have gotten used to the 5105, but it is not as natural for me as the 420. It has grown on me though and become quite comfortable.
I didn't want a tiny saw that I would have to "get used to", and that was not significantly smaller and lighter than what I already have, so I passed. I wasn't a jerk, as I had told the store manager that I just wanted to put the saw on hold until I could see it and I would decide then.
I wasn't thrilled with the tool less adjuster, but it seemed like it would work "okay". But why bother with adding complexity, weight and bulk for this feature? Kind of silly, I think. Overall the little saw appeared to be well put together.. all spring Av, adjustable metal oiler, durable feeling plastic, etc, so no problem there for a plastic saw.
The 3201 might fit someone else's needs perfectly.
Thanks for the help on this one guys, sorry for the bother.