Duhhhh,
remember your old avi there?
Clowns still creep me out
I was waiting for someone to cry, lol. It works! I've seen no evidence at all to suggest that there is a measurable difference in performance between cutting the squishband and making a popup. From what I see, cutting the squishband is a useful method when needing to lower exhaust or transfer port timing, or when wanting more compression than can be had with a popup. Neither of those are a requirement for this build.
Hey, I cleaned up .017"of squishband!Lame....
Man up already!!!
Hey, I cleaned up .017"of squishband!
Same compression and port timing in both? In other words, did you isolate it to popup vs squishband cut? I have not seen that done.You forgot the other .023
Seriously, I've done both. The chamber cut ones are on a different level. Real, usable, rpm maintaining torque to go with those rpm. 8 pin torque.
But I digress...
Hush Bozo.
You're messing up this thread with your silly opinions. We all know you can't build a saw in less than a year.......
Same compression and port timing in both? In other words, did you isolate it to popup vs squishband cut? I have not seen that done.
They're made of steel. They can take itIf you've not seen that done, what evidence are you citing?
Not trying to bust your balls, but...well... Nevermind, I am busting your balls. LOL
Pics of the steel balls?
Could you explain this a little better? What's the other .023? The way Brads doing it would get the ports back near stock without having to cut them. Cutting the squish out of the cyl would result in lower port timing, right? Is it the lower port timing numbers you like better?You forgot the other .023
Seriously, I've done both. The chamber cut ones are on a different level. Real, usable, rpm maintaining torque to go with those rpm. 8 pin torque.
But I digress...
Enter your email address to join: