New Saw Technology - Who Has It, Who Doesn't?

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Sagetown

Sagetown

Farmer and a STIHL
Joined
Dec 24, 2010
Messages
20,442
Location
SE Oklahoma
Direct cylinder injection? Really - on a saw? Is this the system Stihl has on a concrete saw or something? Clearly that would have major benefits on a 2-stroke, although the lubrication issue would have to be dealt with. Direct cylinder injection requires a lot of pressure and would be a lot more complex.

Happy Birthday WoodHeatWarrior. :chainsawguy::wave::bday:
 
mountainlake

mountainlake

Addicted to ArboristSite
. AS Supporting Member.
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
5,033
Location
minnesota
The benefit is that the injector puts the fuel where it's needed: into the combustion chamber. An auxiliary injector can be set up for the bottom end to keep the bearings happy. When the computer gets it all synchronized, very little unburned mix will go out the exhaust port and the saw will run all day, in changing conditions and also run with the poor fuel available from the pump.

I'd guess direct injection will be coming, untill then I'd rather tune my saws. Steve
 
Chris-PA

Chris-PA

Where the Wild Things Are
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
10,090
Location
PA
OK - could we avoid brand bashing or pining for the simpler days of yore? While I am an engineer designing electronics, I am actually no fan of overcomplication or gratuitous technology. Also, I quite like Echos and Makitas and don't think absolute minimum weight and max horsepower are the only measures of a good saw. However, without some major change the 2-stroke is dead because people are not going to put up with the pollution and fuel waste from its inherent design deficiencies. And part of that reputation for pollution is actually the defective "carburetors" that they used for so long, but no matter the damage is done. These systems are being introduced in a desperate attempt to meet the regs and companies that don't have them will likely be out of the US market.

What I wanted to figure out was who owns them, who has to pay royalties and who is out in the cold? Also if there were some other alternatives to strato and feedback carbs coming down the line. Companies will often put a lot of R&D in rather than spending money on royalties to a competitor - sometimes this is for good stuff and sometimes it ends up just being half-assed workarounds (which is what SLR looks like to me, but maybe not).

Maybe crankcase injection has some advantage over a feedback carb, although I don't see it, but it would be mechanically more complicated. You could try to time the injection pulses for late in the scavenge part of the cycle to get a strato-like effect I guess, and it might get Stihl around Husky's patents - but likely at a higher cost. And just because they do direct cylinder injection on mounted engines does not translate into hand-held tools.

So it looks like strato and feedback carbs for the foreseeable future - these really are major advances, and Husky owns them both. Maybe crankcase injection eventually but I wouldn't hold my breath for direct cylinder injection. SLR will probably go nowhere.
 
Last edited:
one.man.band

one.man.band

ArboristSite Guru
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
567
Location
100 miles south of canada
Interesting, I didn't realize Echo was going with strato. We'll see how 4-strokes work out for chainsaws.

I still haven't figured out what I think of that SLR thing, though I've read the explanation a few times. Seems like they have to match the volume of that chamber to the volume of the cylinder, but I'm not sure if it requires any resonance tuning. It kinda looks like it would, but if so then it would only really work at one rpm. I would assume opening up the muffler would defeat it completely.

adding around 4 oz. of extra steel to make a muffler with dual chambers:
-reducing scavenging losses (i.e. unburned fuel vapor exiting muffler) by 15%
-reducing emissions without the use of catalytic converter
-reduction of fuel consumption by up to 40%

all by adding about 4 oz. of extra steel.

seems like they out-thought the big guys by a touch. and thier system never clogs like a cat that is rated for about 50 hours on the big guys saws.
 
sachsmo

sachsmo

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
6,210
Location
Indiana
adding around 4 oz. of extra steel to make a muffler with dual chambers:
-reducing scavenging losses (i.e. unburned fuel vapor exiting muffler) by 15%
-reducing emissions without the use of catalytic converter
-reduction of fuel consumption by up to 40%

all by adding about 4 oz. of extra steel.

seems like they out-thought the big guys by a touch. and thier system never clogs like a cat that is rated for about 50 hours on the big guys saws.

So are you saying the SLR works?
 
Chris-PA

Chris-PA

Where the Wild Things Are
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
10,090
Location
PA
adding around 4 oz. of extra steel to make a muffler with dual chambers:
-reducing scavenging losses (i.e. unburned fuel vapor exiting muffler) by 15%
-reducing emissions without the use of catalytic converter
-reduction of fuel consumption by up to 40%

all by adding about 4 oz. of extra steel.

seems like they out-thought the big guys by a touch. and thier system never clogs like a cat that is rated for about 50 hours on the big guys saws.
Yes, but......

The thing works by having a chamber in the muffler that fills with exhaust during the scavenge period so that there is too much backpressure for the fuel/air mixture to get out the port. Then once the exhaust port closes this accumulated exhaust must exit out of the chamber through the restricted outlet before the port opens again. There must be some kind of pulse tuning involved and the shape must be important, otherwise the chamber would fill with stagnant/unmoving gasses and it would just look like a muffler with a teeny outlet. It cannot help but have a lot of backpressure. I'll agree it's cheap.

Do they need to use a cat with strato and feedback carbs?
 
sachsmo

sachsmo

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
6,210
Location
Indiana
that's what dolmar's description says.

just think it's quite an achievement for minimum extra production cost.

-omb

what they have the added helmholtz resonator tuned to would be interesting to know.

-OMB

Perhaps there are still secrets of Physics that are yet to be realized eh?
 
stihl023/5

stihl023/5

Addicted to ArboristSite
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
9,452
Location
North
oh, you guys.

If you bought a car in 1940, it might have a total lifespan of 200K miles if you were lucky, and in that time it would have needed countless timing adjustmets, carb adjustments. Heck, it probably have had the heads off at least twice to make it that long and maybe even bottom end work. Not to mention rotting hoses, belts and other assorted junk.

Nowadays, you buy a new vehicle and they last 300K+ without ever needing anything adjusted. Stuff still wears out and breaks, but man the reliability is a billion times better even though it is a drastically more complicated machine.

You are not talking about the so called big three.:potstir:
 
CATDIESEL

CATDIESEL

ArboristSite Operative
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
223
Location
IN THE WOODS
As I understand it, it is very simple - Stihl is paying Husky to use the first generation Strato and AutoTune technology, but aren't allowed to use the second generation of either.
you have been saying this for a while now, do you have proof of this????? i am not saying it is or is not true. it is funny how stihl is supposidly using the first gen. autotune and it works perfectly, and the latest and greatest AT has its share of issues. you do not have to read here much to see it either, with the exception of Sunfish' AT saws , his has had zero issues ever. again i am not saying it is/is not true, just wondering where the proof is. the new stihl fuel injection is light years ahead of m-tronic or autotune, did husky design that too????????
 
Hedgerow

Hedgerow

HACK
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
15,356
Location
Carthage, MO
that's what dolmar's description says.

just think it's quite an achievement for minimum extra production cost.

-omb

what they have the added helmholtz resonator tuned to would be interesting to know.

-OMB

And for those of us that can't leave things alone, a simple muffler removal and hollowing, gets the 7910 back to the power we've become accustomed to in the 7900...
And keeps the platform around for a bit longer...
 
Hedgerow

Hedgerow

HACK
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
15,356
Location
Carthage, MO
you have been saying this for a while now, do you have proof of this????? i am not saying it is or is not true. it is funny how stihl is supposidly using the first gen. autotune and it works perfectly, and the latest and greatest AT has its share of issues. you do not have to read here much to see it either, with the exception of Sunfish' AT saws , his has had zero issues ever. again i am not saying it is/is not true, just wondering where the proof is. the new stihl fuel injection is light years ahead of m-tronic or autotune, did husky design that too????????

There's a 562xp in my shop that has had zero issues also...
And a brand new Echo CS600p... That ones just a strato... But a very well made machine.
Limiters have been removed already... "and it needed it"
 
zogger

zogger

Tree Freak
Joined
Nov 23, 2010
Messages
16,456
Location
North Georgia
adding around 4 oz. of extra steel to make a muffler with dual chambers:
-reducing scavenging losses (i.e. unburned fuel vapor exiting muffler) by 15%
-reducing emissions without the use of catalytic converter
-reduction of fuel consumption by up to 40%

all by adding about 4 oz. of extra steel.

seems like they out-thought the big guys by a touch. and thier system never clogs like a cat that is rated for about 50 hours on the big guys saws.

They have some sort of modest variable ignition timing as well now.
 
Top