I don't think global warmers include burning wood as a cause of global warming but rather they point to possible ill health effects from breathing wood smoke. From my understanding wood smoke can contain toxins and particulate matter that is known to cause and/or aggravate lung problems. I am not a scientist...I am not afraid of wood smoke but I would imagine that peaceful aroma coming from my chimney ain't too good for me to breath. But...its my choice so I breath it.
I think the global warming crowd recognizes that burning wood is "carbon neutral" and does not contribute to the net carbon make-up in the atmosphere as the carbon trapped in a tree had been there for probably no more than 40 years...give and take a couple extra years. Burning fossil fuels does, they argue, contribute to global warming as the carbon released into the atmosphere had been captured in the ground for millions of years. Our current eco system...what ever that is..., the balance of atmospheric elements including carbon, has established itself based upon this balance for millions of years. When we burn oil, gas etc this carbon is put back into the atmosphere and a "new" balance is created. This new balance can make good and bad things happen based upon our human experience here on earth. I think that is an accurate summary of the global warmers argument.
I, as a woodburner, recognize that pollution is bad for the environment, our health, our air etc. I think we can all agree on that. I don't know if this is causing global warming but I know I would trust a world wide network of scientists over a blow hard politician here in the US. Still I don't know. We have always been part of the balancing act between exploitation of resources for wealth vs. health of person and planet. The big question here is...where do we draw the line. I for one don't know and...to a large extent...don't care as I know that there are others who picked this issue as their axe to grind. I'll leave it to them. For myself I am more worried about finding my next tree to cut, keeping this group of young punks away from my daughters and...of course...if I should buy either the 7900 or 372 XP. I got other things to worry about.
Still...regardless of what side of the debate you fall on I would offer this bit of unsolicited advice. Know your enemy. Calling them names, broad brushing them, and "straw manning" their theory does not contribute to the debate and exposes the weaknesses in your own argument. Instead try to understand where they are coming from, ask tough, but respectful questions, and don't be afraid to change or modify your position. That's enough for me. I'm going to shovel some snow.